首页> 外文OA文献 >Towards a fairer, simpler and more efficient tax shortfall penalty regime
【2h】

Towards a fairer, simpler and more efficient tax shortfall penalty regime

机译:建立更公平,更简单,更有效的税收短缺处罚制度

摘要

AbstractThe Australian Taxation Office’s administrative tax shortfall penalty system is based on the actions of a taxpayer relevant to a tax shortfall. In the absence of the entity’s cooperation in providing documentation and evidence of intent, the determination of the facts from third party sources can be a complex and expensive process. My research has found duplication between s 284-75(3) and s 286-75(1) of the Taxation Administration Act 1953 (TAA) this could not have been the intention of the drafters of these provisions. The only explanation is that the brief prepared for the Explanatory Memorandum to Parliament for s 284-75(3) TAA, did not properly explain the distinction and full purpose of the subsection. The result being that staff engaged in compliance activities have to rely on the formal powers of s 353-10 TAA to obtain source documents from recalcitrant taxpayers. The evidence from cases cited in this thesis is that s 284-75(3) is used only to apply 75% penalty for a default assessment where there is failure to lodge a Statement, s 286-75(1) also applies a different type of penalty effectively for the same offence. This would suggest that ‘other document’ in s 284-75(3)(a) was intended to be for documents substantiating a statement to the Commissioner and not the statements covered by s 286-75(1).The aim of the Commissioner is to gain community confidence thus ensuring taxpayer compliance with tax legislation . This can sometimes be thwarted by complexities and inefficiencies in the penalty system. This study analyses the antecedents of the tax penalty domain and its current practices to make recommendations to enhance taxpayer equity, improve future compliance and make the operation of the regime simpler for all participants. The findings of this study are that a satisfactory administrative tax shortfall penalty regime should involve mutual obligations on the part of the Tax Office and taxpayers; be easy to understand; have the effect of isolating non-compliant taxpayers; and assists in the administration of penalties at lower cost.
机译:摘要澳大利亚税务局的行政性税收短缺处罚制度是基于纳税人与税收短缺相关的行为。在缺乏实体合作提供意图的文件和证据的情况下,从第三方渠道确定事实可能是一个复杂而昂贵的过程。我的研究发现,在1953年《税收管理法案》(TAA)的284-75(3)和286-75(1)之间存在重复,这可能不是这些条款的起草者的意图。唯一的解释是,为议会针对284-75(3)TAA的《解释性备忘录》准备的摘要并未正确解释该小节的区别和全部目的。结果是从事合规活动的工作人员必须依靠353-10 TAA的正式权力才能从顽固的纳税人那里获得原始文件。从本论文引用的案例中得出的证据是,第284-75(3)条仅用于对未能提交声明的违约评估施加75%的罚款,第286-75(1)条也适用于另一种类型对同一罪行有效地处以罚款。这表明,第284-75(3)(a)条中的“其他文件”旨在用于证实向专员声明而不是第286-75(1)条所涵盖的声明的文件。专员的目的是为了获得社区的信任,从而确保纳税人遵守税收法规。有时可能会由于处罚系统的复杂性和效率低下而受到阻碍。本研究分析了税收领域的先例及其当前做法,以提出建议以增强纳税人权益,改善未来合规性并简化所有参与者的税收制度的运作。这项研究的结果是,令人满意的行政税收短缺处罚制度应包括税务局和纳税人的共同义务;易于理解;具有隔离不合规纳税人的作用;并以较低的成本协助管理罚款。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号