首页> 外文OA文献 >The disutility of assessing trust beneficiaries on income derived by trustees: a critique of the existing regime whereunder beneficiaries are taxed on trust income before they receive it
【2h】

The disutility of assessing trust beneficiaries on income derived by trustees: a critique of the existing regime whereunder beneficiaries are taxed on trust income before they receive it

机译:对受托人获得的收入评估信托受益人的用处不大:对现行制度的批评,根据现行制度,受益人在获得信托收入之前要对其征税

摘要

The Australian tax policy of assessing trusts and their beneficiaries has been buffeted by changes that have occurred over the last 10 years or so, chiefly in the rules that equity has adopted and applied in its restatement of the rights and interests that a beneficiary has in a trust. Broadly, the scheme of div 6 of Part III of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 – the general provisions for assessing trustees and beneficiaries – has remained largely unaltered, its machinery has now become ill-suited to equity’s new jurisprudence concerning beneficiaries' interests in trusts.This thesis examines the rules that seek to identify in a beneficiary an interest that she or he has in a trust’s subject matter, and it questions whether the tax legislation is still adequate to work its policies in the light of changes in the rules of equity. Most pressing amongst them is the concept of present entitlement to income as a criterion for assessing beneficiaries of trusts on incomes derived by their trustees – at least before the income is physically paid or dealt with by the trustees so that there is some actual or constructive receipt by the beneficiary of that income.In addition to this, the thesis points to other difficulties that have arisen – largely because of changing jurisprudence – that portend the unworkability of the current tax policy. The proposition is that the only way to correct the present and forthcoming problems, and the tensions they will cause in the Australian tax system, is to abandon the conventional policy of seeking primarily to assess a beneficiary on a mere present entitlement, and instead to assess tax on physical distributions. Under this proposition, a beneficiary will no longer be assessed on anticipated distributions: she or he will now be assessed only on those distributions that are actually made thereto. Naturally enough, a number of other trust assessing issues are affected by the proposal, and the changes to them – largely in a way that makes them simpler – are proposed and submitted.
机译:在过去的10年左右的时间里,澳大利亚对信托及其受益人进行评估的税收政策受到了冲击,主要是因为股权重述了受益人在资产负债表中的权益时所采用和应用的规则。信任。大致而言,《 1936年所得税评估法》第三部分第6分区的计划(评估受托人和受益人的一般规定)基本上保持不变,其机制现已不适合股权新的关于受益人利益的法理学。本论文研究了旨在确定受益人对信托标的具有利益的规则,并质疑税收立法是否仍足以根据其变化来执行其政策。公平规则。其中最紧迫的是目前的收入权利概念,作为评估受托人从其受托人获得的收入中信托受益人的标准–至少在受托人实际支付或处理收入之前,以便有一定的实际或建设性收据除此之外,本文还指出了其他困难,这主要是由于法理学的改变,预示了当前税收政策的不可行性。该主张是,纠正当前和即将出现的问题以及它们将在澳大利亚税制中造成的紧张关系的唯一方法是放弃传统的政策,即仅以当前应得的权利来评估受益人,而是评估实物分销税。根据此提议,将不再根据预期的分配来评估受益人:现在,仅根据实际分配给他们的收益来评估她或他。很自然地,许多其他信任评估问题都受到该提案的影响,并且提出并提交了对它们的更改(主要是通过简化这些更改的方式)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号