首页> 外文OA文献 >Transcending state-centrism: new regionalism and the future of Southern African regional integration
【2h】

Transcending state-centrism: new regionalism and the future of Southern African regional integration

机译:超越国家中心主义:新的区域主义与南部非洲区域一体化的未来

摘要

This dissertation argues that in the 1990s and beyond, the character and functions of regions and regionalism have experienced a major transformation. This requires a reconceptualisation of regions and regionalism that transcends state-centrism. The argument here is that the definition of regions and regionalism needs to recognise that other actors also participate in the construction of regions and the practise of regionalism. Up to now, however, theories of integration incompletely deal with outcomes appropriate to developing countries, states and regions. In the context where people remain vulnerable to top-down forms of regionalism driven by the forces of globalisation, this calls for a new approach in the analytical study of regionalism in a transnational context. The contention is that new regionalism, and its variant, developmental regionalism pay attention to the role those organised civil society actors and those marginalised by both globalisation and regionalisation play in promoting regionalism in a transnational context. Historically, state-centric regionalism in southern Africa was not aimed at achieving developmental objectives. In the case of SACU, the argument is that South Africa used its economic strength in a hegemonial way. To counter-act apartheid South Africa’s economic hegemony, SADCC was formed. SADCC achieved limited success in the fields of infrastructural development and in attracting donor aid. The end of the Cold War and the downfall of apartheid compelled these organisations to recast their objectives and purpose. For SACU this meant changing from an organisation dominated by South Africa to a fully-fledged inter-state one. Disconcertedly, however, about the reforms undertook by SACU, is that the disposition of member states remain important in determining the content and scope of regionalism. SADC, on the other hand, has also not sufficiently reform itself to achieve the ambitious goals it set-out for itself. Moreover, while SADC has since its inception in 1992 set-out to involve non-state actors in its regional integration efforts, limited institutional reform in 2000 and beyond, and elites at the forefront of institutional restructuring make it difficult for non-state actors to contribute to sustainable regional integration. In conclusion, this dissertation maintains that sustainable regionalist orders are best built by recognising that beyond the geometry of state-sovereignty, civil society organisations with a regional focus and the ordinary people of the region also contribute to regioness and as such to the re-conceptualisation of regional community in southern Africa.
机译:本文认为,在1990年代及以后,区域和区域主义的特征和功能发生了重大变化。这就需要超越国家中心主义的地区和区域主义的重新概念化。这里的论点是,区域和区域主义的定义需要认识到其他参与者也参与了区域的建设和区域主义的实践。但是,到目前为止,整合理论还没有完全解决适合发展中国家,州和地区的结果。在人们仍然容易受到全球化力量驱动的自上而下的区域主义形式的影响下,这就要求在跨国背景下对区域主义进行分析研究的一种新方法。争论的焦点是,新的区域主义及其发展性区域主义关注那些有组织的民间社会行动者以及那些被全球化和区域化边缘化的人在跨国背景下促进区域主义的作用。从历史上看,南部非洲以国家为中心的区域主义并非旨在实现发展目标。就SACU而言,争论是南非以霸权方式利用其经济实力。为了抵制种族隔离南非的经济霸权,成立了SADCC。南共体在基础设施发展和吸引捐助者援助方面取得的成功有限。冷战的结束和种族隔离制度的垮台迫使这些组织改头换面。对于SACU来说,这意味着要从南非主导的组织转变为成熟的州际组织。然而,关于SACU进行的改革,令人不安的是,成员国的决定对于确定区域主义的内容和范围仍然很重要。另一方面,南部非洲发展共同体也没有进行充分的改革以实现其为自己设定的宏伟目标。此外,尽管南部非洲发展共同体自1992年成立以来就开始让非国家行为者参与其区域一体化努力,但在2000年及以后的体制改革有限,精英人士处于体制改革的最前沿,这使得非国家行为者很难为可持续的区域一体化做出贡献。总之,本文认为,可持续发展的区域主义秩序最好是通过认识到,除了国家主权的范围之外,关注区域的民间社会组织和该地区的普通百姓也对区域性做出了贡献,并因此对重新概念化做出了贡献。南部非洲的区域社区。

著录项

  • 作者

    Blaauw Lesley;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号