首页> 外文OA文献 >The conceptualisation, sensitivity and measurement of holding costs and other selected elements impacting housing affordability (Literature review and research methodology for confirmation of PhD candidature)
【2h】

The conceptualisation, sensitivity and measurement of holding costs and other selected elements impacting housing affordability (Literature review and research methodology for confirmation of PhD candidature)

机译:持有成本和其他影响住房负担能力的要素的概念化,敏感性和衡量(文献审查和研究方法,用于确认博士学位候选人)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It is widely held that strong relationships exist between housing, economic status, and well being. This is exemplified by widespread housing stock surpluses in many countries which threaten to destabilise numerous aspects related to individuals and community. However, the position of housing demand and supply is not consistent. The Australian position provides a distinct contrast whereby seemingly inexorable housing demand generally remains a critical issue affecting the socio-economic landscape. Underpinned by high levels of immigration, and further buoyed by sustained historically low interest rates, increasing income levels, and increased government assistance for first home buyers, this strong housing demand ensures elements related to housing affordability continue to gain prominence. A significant, but less visible factor impacting housing affordability – particularly new housing development – relates to holding costs. These costs are in many ways “hidden” and cannot always be easily identified. Although it is only one contributor, the nature and extent of its impact requires elucidation. In its simplest form, it commences with a calculation of the interest or opportunity cost of land holding. However, there is significantly more complexity for major new developments - particularly greenfield property development. Preliminary analysis conducted by the author suggests that even small shifts in primary factors impacting holding costs can appreciably affect housing affordability – and notably, to a greater extent than commonly held. Even so, their importance and perceived high level impact can be gauged from the unprecedented level of attention policy makers have given them over recent years. This may be evidenced by the embedding of specific strategies to address burgeoning holding costs (and particularly those cost savings associated with streamlining regulatory assessment) within statutory instruments such as the Queensland Housing Affordability Strategy, and the South East Queensland Regional Plan. However, several key issues require investigation. Firstly, the computation and methodology behind the calculation of holding costs varies widely. In fact, it is not only variable, but in some instances completely ignored. Secondly, some ambiguity exists in terms of the inclusion of various elements of holding costs, thereby affecting the assessment of their relative contribution. Perhaps this may in part be explained by their nature: such costs are not always immediately apparent. Some forms of holding costs are not as visible as the more tangible cost items associated with greenfield development such as regulatory fees, government taxes, acquisition costs, selling fees, commissions and others. Holding costs are also more difficult to evaluate since for the most part they must be ultimately assessed over time in an ever-changing environment, based on their strong relationship with opportunity cost which is in turn dependant, inter alia, upon prevailing inflation and / or interest rates. By extending research in the general area of housing affordability, this thesis seeks to provide a more detailed investigation of those elements related to holding costs, and in so doing determine the size of their impact specifically on the end user. This will involve the development of soundly based economic and econometric models which seek to clarify the componentry impacts of holding costs. Ultimately, there are significant policy implications in relation to the framework used in Australian jurisdictions that promote, retain, or otherwise maximise, the opportunities for affordable housing.
机译:人们普遍认为,住房,经济状况和福祉之间存在密切的关系。许多国家普遍存在的住房剩余过剩就是例证,这有可能破坏与个人和社区有关的许多方面的稳定。但是,住房供求状况不一致。澳大利亚的立场形成了鲜明的对比,看似不可阻挡的住房需求通常仍然是影响社会经济格局的关键问题。强劲的住房需求在高水平的移民以及持续的历史低利率,不断增长的收入水平以及政府对首次购房者的援助的进一步支撑下,确保了与住房负担能力相关的因素继续得到重视。影响住房负担能力的一个重要但鲜为人知的因素-特别是新建住房的发展-与持有成本有关。这些成本在许多方面都是“隐性”的,无法始终轻松识别。尽管它只是一个贡献者,但其影响的性质和程度需要阐明。最简单的形式是从计算土地持有的利息或机会成本开始。但是,重大的新开发项目(尤其是未开发的房地产开发项目)的复杂性大大增加。作者进行的初步分析表明,即使影响持有成本的主要因素发生很小的变化,也会明显影响住房的承受能力,尤其是与普通持有者相比,影响更大。即便如此,政策制定者近年来给予他们的前所未有的关注程度也可以衡量出它们的重要性和高水平的感知力。这可以通过在诸如昆士兰州住房负担能力战略和东南昆士兰州区域计划之类的法定文书中嵌入解决新兴的持有成本(特别是与简化监管评估相关的成本节省)的特定策略来证明。但是,有几个关键问题需要调查。首先,持有成本计算的计算方法和方法存在很大差异。实际上,它不仅可变,而且在某些情况下完全被忽略。其次,在包含各种持有成本要素方面存在一些歧义,从而影响了对它们的相对贡献的评估。也许这可以部分由其性质来解释:此类成本并非总是立即可见。某些形式的持有成本并不像与绿地开发相关的更具体的成本项目那样明显,例如监管费,政府税,购置成本,销售费,佣金等。持有成本也更难以评估,因为在大多数情况下,必须根据不断变化的环境最终对持有成本进行最终评估,这取决于它们与机会成本的密切关系,而后者又取决于当前的通货膨胀和/或利率。通过扩大对住房负担能力的一般研究,本论文旨在对与持有成本相关的那些要素进行更详细的研究,从而确定其对最终用户的影响程度。这将涉及建立稳固的经济和计量模型,以阐明持有成本的组成部分影响。归根结底,与澳大利亚司法管辖区使用的框架相关的重大政策含义是促进,保留或以其他方式最大化负担得起的住房的机会。

著录项

  • 作者

    Garner Gary O.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号