The research project was formulated to solve serious environmental and possible public health problems in rural and regional areas caused by the common failure of soil disposal systems used for application of effluent from on-site domestic sewage treatment systems. On-site sewage treatment systems adopt a treatment train approach with the associated soil disposal area playing a crucial role. The most common on-site sewage treatment system that is used is the conventional septic tank and subsurface effluent disposal system. The subsurface effluent disposal area is given high priority by regulatory authorities due to the significant environmental and public health impacts that can result from their failure. There is generally very poor householder maintenance of the treatment system and this is compounded by the failure of the effluent disposal area resulting in unacceptable surface and groundwater contamination. This underlies the vital importance of employing reliable science-based site suitability assessment techniques for effluent disposal. The research undertaken investigated the role of soil physico-chemical characteristics influencing the behaviour of effluent disposal areas.ududududThe study was conducted within the Logan City Council area, Queensland State, Australia. About 50% of the Logan region is unsewered and the common type of on-site sewage treatment used is a septic tank with subsurface effluent disposal area. The work undertaken consisted of extensive field investigations, soil sampling and testing, laboratory studies and extensive data analysis.ududududIn the field study, forty-eight sites were investigated for their effluent application suitability. The sites were evaluated based on the soil physico-chemical characteristics. The field investigation indicated that there were nine soil orders in the study area. These soil orders were Dermosols, Chromosols, Kandosols, Kurosols, Vertosols, Sodosols, Tenosols, Rudosols and Anthrosols. The soils in all the investigated sites were acidic soils in the pH range between 5 and 6.5.ududududThe complexity of the large data matrix obtained from the analysis was overcome by multivariate analytical methods to assist in evaluating the soils' ability to treat effluent and to understand the importance of various parameters. The analytical methods selected to serve this purpose were PROMETHEE and GAIA. The analysis indicated that the most suitable soils for effluent renovation are the Kandosols whilst the most unsatisfactory soil order was found to be Podosol. The GAIA analysis was in agreement with quantitative analysis conducted earlier.ududududAn extensive laboratory column study lasting almost one year was undertaken to validate the results of the data analysis from the field investigation. The main objectives of this experiment were to examine the soil behaviour under practical effluent application and to investigate the long-term acceptance rate for these soils. Twelve representative soils were selected for the column experiment from the previously investigated sites and undisturbed soil cores were collected for this purpose. The results from the column study matched closely with the evaluation conducted at the earlier stages of the research. Soil physico-chemical analysis before and after effluent application indicated that the soils' acidity was improved toward neutrality after effluent application. The results indicated that soils have a greater ability to handle phosphorus than nitrogen. The most favorable cation exchange capacity for soils to treat and transmit effluent was between 15 and 40 meq/100g.ududududBased on the results of the column study, the long-term acceptance rate (LTAR) was determined for the investigated twelve soil types. Eleven out of twelve soils reported specific LTAR values between 0.18-0.22 cm/day. For the duration of the laboratory study, the Podosol order did not reach its LTAR value due to the extremely sandy nature of the soil. The time required to achieve LTAR varied between different soils from 40 to 330 days. ududududThe outcomes of this research was integrated into a soil suitability map for on-site sewage treatment systems for Logan City Council. This will assist the authorities in providing sustainable solutions for on-site systems failure.
展开▼
机译:制定该研究项目的目的是解决由于用于现场生活污水处理系统的废水处理的土壤处理系统的常见故障而在农村和地区造成的严重环境问题和可能的公共卫生问题。现场污水处理系统采用处理流程方法,相关的土壤处理区域起着至关重要的作用。最常用的现场污水处理系统是常规化粪池和地下污水处理系统。由于地下污水处理场的故障可能对环境和公共健康造成重大影响,因此监管当局将其视作地下污水处理区。通常,家庭居民对处理系统的维护非常差,污水处理区域的故障导致不可接受的地表和地下水污染,这使情况更加复杂。这突出了采用可靠的基于科学的场地适用性评估技术进行废水处理的至关重要性。进行的研究调查了土壤理化特性对污水处理场行为的影响。 ud ud ud ud这项研究是在澳大利亚昆士兰州洛根市议会区域内进行的。洛根地区约有50%的区域没有下水道,而现场污水处理的常用类型是化粪池,该污水池具有地下污水处理区。进行的工作包括广泛的田间调查,土壤采样和测试,实验室研究以及大量的数据分析。 ud ud ud ud在田间研究中,对48个场所的污水处理适用性进行了调查。根据土壤理化特性评估这些地点。现场调查表明,研究区有9个土壤阶。这些土壤阶为:Dermosols,Chromosols,Kandosols,Kurosols,Vertosols,Sodosols,Tenosols,Rudosols和Anthrosols。所有调查地点的土壤均为pH范围在5至6.5之间的酸性土壤。 ud ud ud ud通过多变量分析方法可以克服分析所获得的大型数据矩阵的复杂性,从而有助于评估土壤的处理污水和了解各种参数重要性的能力。为此目的选择的分析方法是PROMETHEE和GAIA。分析表明,最适合进行污水翻新的土壤是Kandosols,而发现最不满意的土壤是Podosol。 GAIA分析与之前进行的定量分析是一致的。 ud ud ud ud进行了将近一年的广泛实验室专栏研究,以验证来自现场调查的数据分析结果。该实验的主要目的是研究实际废水处理下的土壤行为,并研究这些土壤的长期接受率。从先前研究的地点中选择了十二种代表性土壤用于柱实验,并为此收集了未扰动的土壤核心。专栏研究的结果与研究早期阶段的评估非常吻合。污水处理前后土壤理化分析表明,污水处理后土壤酸度向中性方向提高。结果表明,土壤比氮具有更高的处理磷的能力。对于土壤处理和传输废水最有利的阳离子交换能力是15至40 meq / 100g。 ud ud ud ud基于柱研究的结果,确定了土壤的长期接受率(LTAR)调查了十二种土壤类型。在十二种土壤中,有十一种报告的LTAR值在0.18-0.22 cm /天之间。在实验室研究期间,由于土壤的极端沙质,Podosol等级未达到其LTAR值。在不同土壤上,达到LTAR所需的时间从40天到330天不等。 ud ud ud ud这项研究的结果已整合到Logan市议会现场污水处理系统的土壤适宜性地图中。这将有助于当局为现场系统故障提供可持续的解决方案。
展开▼