首页> 外文OA文献 >Personal responsibility : the creation, implementation and evaluation of a school-based program
【2h】

Personal responsibility : the creation, implementation and evaluation of a school-based program

机译:个人责任:基于学校的计划的创建,实施和评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

We live in a society where the individual is prioritised over the collective. Newspaper articles abound lamenting adolescents' lack of personal responsibility and social commentators are increasingly highlighting the need to recapture and interweave an agenda of personal responsibility into the social fabric. Personal responsibility has been defined as being accountable to oneself and the needs and well-being of others (Ruyter, 2002). Doherty (1998) has argued that there is an increasing trend in society to refuse accountability and to blame others for one's situation. Despite these assertions, there is little empirical research that has attempted to define and examine personal responsibility. This dissertation is about the role of personal responsibility in the lives of adolescents. The research program was divided into three studies utilising quantitative and qualitative research methods to answer four research questions. Study 1: How do adolescents and teachers understand 'personal responsibility?' Study 2: Can a quantitative questionnaire define and measure an adolescent's level of personal responsibility? Study 3: Can a program aimed at enhancing the personal responsibility level of adolescents be taught in a high school and demonstrate measurable effect? Is there a relationship between personal responsibility, emotional intelligence and self-esteem? Study 1 used focus groups to address research question 1. Four focus groups with a total of 20 Year 11 students, and two focus groups with a total of 10 teachers were conducted. The results revealed that key components of the personal responsibility variable were choices and consequences, behavioural control, thoughts and feelings, and consideration for others. This finding complemented the definition derived from the literature review. Additionally, the focus group data served to inform Study 2, the development of the Personal Responsibility Questionnaire and Study 3, the creation, implementation and evaluation of the Personal Responsibility Program. Study 2 involved examining appropriate literature, focus group data from Study 1, and related measures to create a quantitative measure assessing personal responsibility in adolescents. A 100-item measure was created and tested on more than 500 adolescents. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were used to determine a final 30-item Personal Responsibility Questionnaire with two factors (factor 1 - 'self control of emotion and thoughts' and factor 2 - 'self control of behaviour'). This measure was to serve in the evaluation of the Personal Responsibility Program. A fundamental aim of the study was to determine whether a Personal Responsibility Program could be implemented in a high school and demonstrate measurable effect. Study 3 involved the creation of the Personal Responsibility Program through examining other values-based education programs and the focus group data obtained in Study 1. Once created, the five-lesson program was implemented twice in one high school, with approximately half of the Year 11 students undertaking the first implementation (the experimental group), and the remaining Year 11 students completing the program during its second implementation (the control group). To assess whether the program had generated any changes in the adolescents' levels of personal responsibility, the Personal Responsibility Questionnaire developed in Study 2 was administered pre- and post-intervention to both the experimental and control groups. Additionally, the well-established constructs of emotional intelligence and self-esteem were assessed using the Emotional Intelligence Scale (Schutte et al., 1998) and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale (Rosenberg, 1965) to determine potential relationships between these variables and to provide additional construct validity for the measure. The results from Study 3 revealed no significant findings on any variable at any time (pre- or post-intervention). Despite this finding, certain data trends were apparent between males and females across the experimental and control groups. Overall, females demonstrated slightly higher mean scores on emotional intelligence and personal responsibility than males, while males had slightly higher mean scores than females on self-esteem. In order to gather additional feedback about the program and the students' learning, qualitative data were gathered from the students and the teachers by completion of a feedback sheet at the end of each lesson and a teacher focus group interview after the first implementation of the Personal Responsibility Program. In relation to student learning, the qualitative data offered by the students showed that learning in the key areas targeted had occurred, with students reflecting on their growth and changing understandings about personal responsibility. With reference to the program, the students commented that the program was fun, interesting, relevant, valuable, and enabled them to learn new things about themselves. Feedback from the teachers highlighted that the students appeared to engage with the program, and that teaching it was rewarding. This research program has contributed to the literature by providing a theoretically and empirically derived definition of personal responsibility. The focus group process highlighted that personal responsibility could be understood and considered by adolescents due to the cognitive and moral sophistication that develops early in this developmental timeframe. Study 2 generated a Personal Responsibility Questionnaire that can be used to assess personal responsibility in adolescents, and Study 3 contributed a Personal Responsibility Program which has been developed from conceptual and empirical literature. The program was designed to be "teacher friendly' and allowed the schools to gather qualitative and quantitative feedback on the success of the program's implementation. As school administrators and teachers often lament the lack of personal responsibility in their students (Lickona, 1992), this program could be used to address this concern and put the issue of personal responsibility firmly on the agenda in high schools.
机译:我们生活在一个个人优先于集体的社会中。报纸上的文章充斥着哀叹青少年缺乏个人责任感,社会评论员越来越强调必须重新捕捉个人责任议程并将其交织到社会结构中。个人责任已被定义为对自己以及他人的需求和福祉负责(Ruyter,2002)。多赫蒂(Doherty,1998)认为,社会上有一种日益增长的趋势,即拒绝追究责任,并为自己的情况指责他人。尽管有这些主张,但很少有经验研究试图定义和检验个人责任。本文是关于个人责任在青少年生活中的作用。该研究计划分为三个研究,利用定量和定性研究方法回答四个研究问题。研究1:青少年和老师如何理解“个人责任”?研究2:定量问卷能否定义和衡量青少年的个人责任感?研究3:是否可以在高中教授旨在提高青少年个人责任感的计划,并显示出可衡量的效果?个人责任,情商和自尊之间有关系吗?研究1使用焦点小组来解决研究问题1。进行了四个焦点小组,总共20名11年级学生,以及两个焦点小组,总共10名教师。结果表明,个人责任变量的关键组成部分是选择和后果,行为控制,思想和感情以及对他人的考虑。这一发现补充了文献综述的定义。此外,焦点小组的数据还为研究2,个人责任调查表的制定和研究3,个人责任计划的创建,实施和评估提供了信息。研究2涉及检查适当的文献资料,研究1的焦点小组数据以及相关措施,以建立定量评估青少年个人责任感的措施。创建了一项100项措施,并在500多名青少年中进行了测试。探索性因素分析(EFA)和确认性因素分析(CFA)用于确定具有两个因素的最终30项个人责任问卷(因素1-“对情绪和思想的自我控制”和因素2-“对行为的自我控制” )。该措施将用于评估个人责任计划。这项研究的基本目的是确定个人责任计划是否可以在高中实施并显示出可衡量的效果。研究3涉及通过研究其他基于价值观的教育计划以及研究1中获得的焦点小组数据来创建个人责任计划。一旦创建,五堂课计划在一所高中中实施了两次,大约一年11名学生进行了第一个实施(实验组),其余11年级的学生在第二个实施中完成了该程序(对照组)。为了评估该计划是否对青少年的个人责任感产生了任何变化,在研究2之前和之后对实验组和对照组进行了研究2中制定的个人责任调查表。此外,使用情绪智力量表(Schutte等,1998)和罗森伯格自尊量表(Rosenberg,1965)评估了行之有效的情绪智力和自尊建构,以确定这些变量之间的潜在关系并提供该措施的其他构造效度。研究3的结果表明,在任何时候(干预前或干预后),任何变量均无明显发现。尽管有这个发现,但实验组和对照组中男性和女性之间的某些数据趋势仍然很明显。总体而言,女性在情商和个人责任方面的平均得分略高于男性,而男性在自尊方面的平均得分则略高于女性。为了收集有关计划和学生学习的更多反馈,通过在每节课结束时填写反馈表并在首次实施“个人”后进行教师焦点小组访谈,从学生和老师那里收集定性数据责任计划。关于学生的学习,学生提供的定性数据表明,已经在目标重点领域进行了学习,学生反思了他们的成长和对个人责任感的变化。关于该程序,学生们评论说该程序很有趣,很有趣,相关,有价值,并使他们能够学习有关自己的新事物。老师的反馈突出表明,学生似乎参与了该计划,并且对其进行教学是有益的。该研究计划通过提供理论和经验得出的个人责任定义,为文献做出了贡献。焦点小组会议强调,由于在这个发展时期的早期发展中的认知和道德技巧,青少年可以理解和考虑个人责任。研究2生成了可用于评估青少年个人责任的个人责任调查表,研究3贡献了根据概念和经验文献制定的个人责任计划。该计划的设计是“对教师友好的”,并允许学校收集有关该计划实施成功与否的定性和定量反馈信息。由于学校管理人员和教师经常感叹学生缺乏个人责任感(Lickona,1992),该计划可以用来解决这一问题,并将个人责任问题牢牢地放在高中的议程上。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mergler Amanda G.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号