首页> 外文OA文献 >Newcastle City Council and the grassroots : accountability and budgeting under austerity.
【2h】

Newcastle City Council and the grassroots : accountability and budgeting under austerity.

机译:纽卡斯尔市议会和基层:紧缩政策下的问责制和预算编制。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to shed light on new accountability relationships betweenudNewcastle City Council (NCC) and its citizens and stakeholders in the wake of the British government’sudausterity politics and its budget cuts for local authorities. It seeks to show some of the ways in whichudvarious kinds of budgeting, for example, for alternative sources of funding, the use of volunteers forudservice provision, resource sharing, and asset transfers, as well as a diverse set of accounts of the socialudimplications of resource diversions and service cuts, have been implicated in those changes.udDesign/methodology/approach – The authors conducted a qualitative field study of some of theuduses of budgets in the shaping of accountability relationships through interviews with council officers,udconversations with activists and citizens, analysis of council and other documents, and observation ofudpublic meetings and demonstrations. The approach focused on the relationship between the city’sudpolitical grassroots and the NCC leadership and administration.udFindings – The authors find that NCC’s senior politicians and officers co-opted the city’s politicaludgrassroots and managed to reconstitute local political accountability to citizenry and stakeholders as audchoice between the cessation of different types of local government services, by combining appeals toudthe legal framework of English local authorities, the unfairness of national politics, and the fairness ofudlocal government service provision. Local government blamed the funding cuts and the resultingudresource shortages on the central government. It sought to push responsibility for cuts to the localudcitizenry whilst reserving for itself the role of mediator and adjudicator who makes the final decisionsudabout the portfolio of causes that will be funded.udOriginality/value – This is the first study to offer detailed insight into the effects of the Britishudgovernment’s austerity budget cuts of local authority grants on the politics of accountability in a localudauthority.
机译:目的–本文的目的是阐明随着英国政府的“节俭性政治”及其对地方政府的预算削减,纽卡斯尔市议会(NCC)与市民和利益相关者之间的新的问责关系。它试图显示一些各种预算方法,例如,替代性资金来源,使用志愿人员提供 udservice,资源共享和资产转移,以及各种不同的帐户预算。 udDesign / methodology / approach –作者对定于问责制关系中的一些预算 udus进行了定性实地研究,通过与市议会的访谈对这些问责进行了定性研究。官员,与维权人士和公民进行的对话,对理事会和其他文件的分析以及对udpublic会议和示威活动的观察。该方法侧重于城市的 udpoli基层与NCC领导层和行政部门之间的关系。 udFindings –作者发现,NCC的高级政治家和官员们选择了该城市的政治 udgrassroots,并设法重新构建了对公民和利益相关者的地方政治责任制通过将对英国地方政府法律框架的呼吁,国家政治的不公平以及提供地方政府服务的公平性结合起来,作为停止不同类型的地方政府服务之间的一种选择。地方政府将资金削减以及由此导致的无资源短缺归咎于中央政府。它试图将削减开支的责任推给当地的 udcitizes,同时保留自己的调解人和裁决人的角色,由他们决定将要资助的原因的最终决定。 udOriginity / value –这是第一项提供的研究详细了解英国 udd政府的紧缩预算削减地方政府拨款对地方 udauthority问责政治的影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ahrens T.; Ferry L.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号