This study is distinct from previous studies in its inclusion of new models, consideration of sector correlation and performance of comprehensive sensitivity analysis. CreditRisk++, CreditMetrics, the Basel II internal-ratings-based method and the Mercer Oliver Wyman model are considered. Risk factor distribution and the relationship between risk components and risk factors are the key distinguishing characteristics of each model. CreditRisk++, due to its extra degree of freedom, has the highest flexibility to fit various loss distributions. It turns out that sector covariance is the most important risk component for risk management in terms of risk sensitivity. Risk sensitivities not only differ between models but also depend on the input parameters and the quantile at which risk is measured. This implies that risk models can only be judged in terms of the portfolio under consideration, and banks should evaluate them based on their own portfolios.
展开▼
机译:这项研究与以前的研究不同之处在于它包含了新模型,对部门相关性的考虑以及综合敏感性分析的性能。考虑了CreditRisk ++,CreditMetrics,基于Basel II内部评级的方法和Mercer Oliver Wyman模型。风险因素分布以及风险成分与风险因素之间的关系是每个模型的关键区别特征。 CreditRisk ++由于具有额外的自由度,因此具有适应各种损失分布的最高灵活性。事实证明,就风险敏感性而言,行业协方差是风险管理中最重要的风险组成部分。风险敏感性不仅在模型之间有所不同,而且还取决于输入参数和衡量风险的分位数。这意味着只能根据所考虑的投资组合来判断风险模型,银行应根据自己的投资组合对其进行评估。
展开▼