首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparative analysis of credit risk models for loan portfolios.
【2h】

Comparative analysis of credit risk models for loan portfolios.

机译:贷款组合信用风险模型的比较分析。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study is distinct from previous studies in its inclusion of new models, consideration of sector correlation and performance of comprehensive sensitivity analysis. CreditRisk++, CreditMetrics, the Basel II internal-ratings-based method and the Mercer Oliver Wyman model are considered. Risk factor distribution and the relationship between risk components and risk factors are the key distinguishing characteristics of each model. CreditRisk++, due to its extra degree of freedom, has the highest flexibility to fit various loss distributions. It turns out that sector covariance is the most important risk component for risk management in terms of risk sensitivity. Risk sensitivities not only differ between models but also depend on the input parameters and the quantile at which risk is measured. This implies that risk models can only be judged in terms of the portfolio under consideration, and banks should evaluate them based on their own portfolios.
机译:这项研究与以前的研究不同之处在于它包含了新模型,对部门相关性的考虑以及综合敏感性分析的性能。考虑了CreditRisk ++,CreditMetrics,基于Basel II内部评级的方法和Mercer Oliver Wyman模型。风险因素分布以及风险成分与风险因素之间的关系是每个模型的关键区别特征。 CreditRisk ++由于具有额外的自由度,因此具有适应各种损失分布的最高灵活性。事实证明,就风险敏感性而言,行业协方差是风险管理中最重要的风险组成部分。风险敏感性不仅在模型之间有所不同,而且还取决于输入参数和衡量风险的分位数。这意味着只能根据所考虑的投资组合来判断风险模型,银行应根据自己的投资组合对其进行评估。

著录项

  • 作者

    Han C.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号