首页> 外文OA文献 >Effects of seismic devices on transverse responses of piers in the Sutong Bridge
【2h】

Effects of seismic devices on transverse responses of piers in the Sutong Bridge

机译:地震装置对苏通大桥桥墩横向响应的影响。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Sutong Bridge in China opened to traffic in 2008, and is an arterial connection between the cities of Nantong and Suzhou. It is a cable-stayed bridge with a main span of 1,088 m. Due to a tight construction schedule and lack of suitable seismic devices at the time, fixed supports were installed between the piers and the girder in the transverse direction. As a result, significant transverse seismic forces could occur in the piers and foundations, especially during a return period of a 2500-year earthquake. Therefore, the piers, foundations and fixed bearings had to be designed extraordinarily strong. However, when larger earthquakes occur, the bearings, piers and foundations are still vulnerable. The recent rapid developments in seismic technology and the performance-based design approach offer a better opportunity to optimize the transverse seismic design for the Sutong Bridge piers. The optimized design can be applied to the Sutong Bridge (as a retrofit), as well as other bridges. Seismic design alternatives utilizing viscous fluid dampers (VFD), or friction pendulum sliding bearings (FPSB), or transverse yielding metallic dampers (TYMD) are thoroughly studied in this work, and the results are compared with those from the current condition with fixed transverse supports and a hypothetical condition in which only sliding bearings are provided on top of the piers (the girder can move “freely” in the transverse direction during the earthquake, except for frictional forces of the sliding bearings). Parametric analyses were performed to optimize the design of these proposed seismic devices. From the comparison of the peak bridge responses in these configurations, it was found that both VFD and TYMD are very effective in the reduction of transverse seismic forces in piers, while at the same time keeping the relative transverse displacements between piers and the box girder within acceptable limits. However, compared to VFD, TYMD do not interact with the longitudinal displacements of the girder, and have simpler details and lower initial and maintenance costs. Although the use of FPSB can also reduce seismic forces, it generally causes the transverse relative displacements to be higher than acceptable limits.
机译:中国的苏通大桥于2008年通车,是南通和苏州之间的干线连接。它是一座斜拉桥,主跨为1,088 m。由于紧张的施工进度和当时缺乏合适的地震设备,因此在墩和梁之间沿横向方向安装了固定支撑。结果,特别是在2500年地震的重现期,墩和地基中可能会产生很大的横向地震力。因此,墩,地基和固定轴承必须设计得非常坚固。但是,当发生大地震时,轴承,桥墩和地基仍然很脆弱。地震技术和基于性能的设计方法的最新快速发展为优化苏通大桥墩的横向地震设计提供了更好的机会。优化的设计可以应用于苏通大桥(作为改造)以及其他桥梁。在这项工作中,对使用粘性流体阻尼器(VFD),摩擦摆式滑动轴承(FPSB)或横向屈服金属阻尼器(TYMD)的抗震设计方案进行了详尽的研究,并将结果与​​采用固定横向支撑的当前条件进行了比较。假设条件下,仅在墩顶上设置滑动轴承(地震期间,大梁可以在横向方向上“自由”移动,但滑动轴承的摩擦力除外)。进行了参数分析,以优化这些拟议地震设备的设计。通过比较这些配置中的峰值桥梁响应,发现VFD和TYMD都在减小桥墩中的横向地震力方面非常有效,同时将桥墩与箱形梁之间的相对横向位移保持在可接受的限制。但是,与VFD相比,TYMD不与梁的纵向位移相互作用,并且具有更简单的细节以及较低的初始和维护成本。尽管使用FPSB也可以减小地震力,但通常会导致横向相对位移高于可接受的极限。

著录项

  • 作者

    Shen X.; Camara A.; Ye A. J.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号