首页> 外文OA文献 >Analysis of mortgage fees differentials among four types of lenders in Australia
【2h】

Analysis of mortgage fees differentials among four types of lenders in Australia

机译:澳大利亚四种类型的贷方抵押贷款费用差异分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Mortgage fees that are charged by lenders have caused increasing concerns to borrowers and policymakers, and heighted debate over the time with particular scrutiny during the recent global financial crisis. Interestingly however, there is almost no research on mortgage fees in the Australian context. This paper analyzes mortgage fee differentials among banks, mortgage corporations, building societies and credit unions operating in Australia during the research period. Findings suggest that banks charged the highest total, origination and ongoing fees while mortgage corporations have the lowest ongoing fees. The results also suggest that mortgage corporations require the same level of total fees as those of member-based institutions (building societies and credit unions), however banks and building societies have about 7 and 3 basis points of ongoing fees respectively more than mortgage corporations. Ongoing fees are an important mortgage cost because a borrower must pay them for a whole life of a loan, unlike the upfront fees that are paid just once. It also suggests that unlike mortgage corporations (the securitizer), depository lenders that charged higher ongoing fees probably maintain the customer relationship. This provides preliminary evidence in line with the existing US literature that there are statistically significant differences between the fee structures of Australian mortgage products.
机译:贷方收取的抵押费引起了借款人和决策者越来越多的关注,并且随着时间的流逝,在最近的全球金融危机期间,人们对辩论进行了特别的审查。然而有趣的是,在澳大利亚背景下,几乎没有关于抵押费用的研究。本文分析了研究期间在澳大利亚运营的银行,抵押公司,建筑协会和信用合作社之间的抵押费用差异。调查结果表明,银行收取最高的总费用,发起费用和持续费用,而抵押公司的最低持续费用。结果还表明,抵押公司要求的总费用水平与基于成员的机构(建筑协会和信用合作社)的水平相同,但是银行和建筑协会的持续费用分别比抵押公司高7个和3个基点。持续的费用是一项重要的抵押成本,因为借款人必须在贷款的整个使用期内支付这些费用,这与仅需支付一次的前期费用不同。这也表明,与抵押贷款公司(证券化公司)不同,收取较高持续费用的存贷放贷方可能会维持客户关系。这提供了与美国现有文献一致的初步证据,即澳大利亚抵押产品的收费结构之间在统计上存在显着差异。

著录项

  • 作者

    Liu Benjamin; Brimble Mark;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号