首页> 外文OA文献 >Evaluating strip farming systems for arid ecosystems: A stochastic approach.
【2h】

Evaluating strip farming systems for arid ecosystems: A stochastic approach.

机译:评估干旱生态系统的带状耕作系统:一种随机方法。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The objectives of this study were: (a) to delineate a methodology for determining the feasibility of a water harvesting system for an arid ecosystem, (b) to develop a simulation model for the water balance of a water harvesting strip farming system, and (c) to perform a sensitivity analysis of the simulation model. The discussion focuses on the feasibility as constrained by risk. A computer program was developed for the computations. The results indicate that light textured soils cannot be used for this type of farming system since their hydrodynamic characteristics do not allow runoff from light rains (i.e. the threshold value is high). Medium textured soils require a minimum of 50% of initial soil water content and a CCAR of 2:1. Heavy soils require a minimum of 20% of initial soil water content and a CCAR greater than 5:1. As a general rule, the system is more efficient, in terms of water use efficiency (eᵤ), as the conditions become dryer. In this way, for CCAR ranging from 0 to 5 eᵤ is around 95% for all three textures. Beyond that point, as the CCAR increases eᵤ decreases being more efficient light soils and less efficient heavy soils. The shapes of the curves of profit, reflect the impact of weather conditions on the response of output to varying CCAR. Lack of rainfall prior to and during the growing season results in poor outputs. The risk (probability of loss) will depend on both the farmers own criteria and the economical situation. Thus, these criteria can be divided into two broad categories: risk-taking (those farmers who pursue a high level of investment relative to the probability of failure), and risk-adverse (those farmers with low level of investment relative to the probability of failure). Curves of minimum risk-maximum net benefit (minimax) were developed as a guide for decision making processes. According to the minimax curves, for medium soils, the minimum risk maximum net benefit is achieved with CCAR 2:1 and initial soil water content of 100%. This implies a risk of 0.2 and net benefit of $510.00. For heavy textured soils, the minimum risk maximum net benefit is achieved with CCAR 10:1 and initial soil water content of 100% with a risk of 0.55 and net benefit of $580.00. The sensitivity analysis indicate that the model is sensitive to: (1) initial soil water content, (2) soil depth and (3) soil texture in terms of reduction on yield (actual/potential yield).
机译:这项研究的目的是:(a)描绘一种确定干旱生态系统集水系统可行性的方法,(b)开发集水带状耕作系统水平衡的模拟模型,以及( c)对仿真模型进行敏感性分析。讨论的重点是受风险约束的可行性。开发了用于计算的计算机程序。结果表明,轻质土壤不能用于这种类型的耕作系统,因为它们的水动力特性不允许小雨径流(即阈值很高)。中型土壤需要至少50%的初始土壤水分,CCAR为2:1。重土壤至少需要初始土壤水分的20%,CCAR大于5:1。通常,随着条件变得干燥,该系统在用水效率(eᵤ)方面更加有效。这样,对于CCAR,所有三个纹理的范围从0到5eᵤ约为95%。超过这一点,随着CCAR的增加,e减少,效率更高的轻质土壤和效率降低的重质土壤。利润曲线的形状反映了天气条件对产出对变化的CCAR的响应的影响。生长季节之前和期间缺乏降雨导致产量下降。风险(损失的可能性)将取决于农民自己的标准和经济状况。因此,这些标准可以分为两大类:冒险(相对于失败的可能性追求高投资水平的农民)和逆向(相对于失败的可能性降低投资水平的农民)失败)。制定了最小风险-最大净收益(最小-最大)曲线,作为决策流程的指南。根据minimax曲线,对于中等土壤,使用CCAR 2:1和100%的初始土壤含水量可实现最小的风险最大净收益。这意味着风险为0.2,净收益为$ 510.00。对于重质土壤,使用CCAR 10:1和100%的初始土壤含水量可获得最小风险最大净收益,风险为0.55,净收益为$ 580.00。敏感性分析表明,该模型对以下方面敏感:(1)初始土壤含水量;(2)土壤深度;(3)就产量降低(实际/潜在产量)而言,土壤质地。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sanchez Cohen Ignacio.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1994
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号