首页> 外文OA文献 >Education and occupational sex segregation: The case of women in engineering.
【2h】

Education and occupational sex segregation: The case of women in engineering.

机译:教育和职业性别隔离:从事工程领域的女性。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Occupational sex segregation is one explanation for the sex gap in pay. Traditionally female occupations offered low wages, few benefits and lacked ladders of upward mobility. In the United States, education is viewed as a route to upward mobility. Prior to legislation enacted in the early 1970's, however, men's and women's educational opportunities varied. Women's enrollments at medical, law and engineering schools were limited. After removal of such limitations, however, women's penetration of these fields over the past twenty years has varied. Women comprised one third of all new medical doctors and more than 40% of all new lawyers, but only 14% of all bachelors degrees in engineering were awarded to women in 1987. This dissertation answers two questions. First, what factors are instrumental in college students' decision to major in engineering? Second, given they major in engineering, what factors account for sex differences in the completion of a bachelors degree in engineering? Multinomial logit models of major choice are constructed with data from the 1980 senior cohort of the High School and Beyond longitudinal survey. The base year (1980), three follow-up waves (1982, 1984, and 1986) and the Post-Secondary Transcript data were used. Enrollment characteristics of engineering schools in the early 1980's are compiled from several archival sources. The multinomial logit models are decomposed to determine the percent of the sex gap in major choice explained by the models and the relative importance of high school preparation and skills, attitudes and structural constraints as explanations of the sex differences in engineering education. It is shown that, at most, 9.2% of the sex gap in the choice of engineering is explained by the factors specified by the policy literature (i.e., sex differences in high school preparation and skills and occupational attitudes). As much as 77% of the sex gap is attributable to sex differences in how fields of study are viewed. Finally, women who majored in engineering in 1982 were more likely than their male counterparts to complete a bachelors degree in engineering by 1986. Therefore, the primary issue regarding women and engineering education concerns the initial attraction of women to engineering programs.
机译:职业性别隔离是薪酬性别差距的一种解释。传统上,女性职业工资低,收益少,缺乏向上流动的阶梯。在美国,教育被视为实现向上流动的途径。但是,在1970年代初颁布法律之前,男女受教育的机会各不相同。医学院,法学院和工学院的女性入学人数有限。但是,在消除这些限制之后,过去二十年来,妇女在这些领域的渗透率发生了变化。在1987年,女性占所有新医生的三分之一,占所有新律师的40%以上,但在工程学学士学位中,只有14%被授予女性。本文回答了两个问题。首先,哪些因素有助于大学生决定工程专业?其次,鉴于他们主修工程学,在工程学学士学位的完成过程中,哪些因素造成了性别差异?主要选择的多项式logit模型是根据1980年高中和远景调查的高级队列数据构建的。使用基准年(1980年),三个后续浪潮(1982年,1984年和1986年)和中学后成绩单数据。 1980年代初期,工科学校的入学特点是从几个档案资料中收集的。分解多项式logit模型,以确定该模型解释的主要选择中的性别差距的百分比,以及高中预科和技能,态度和结构性约束作为工程教育中性别差异的解释的相对重要性。结果表明,政策选择中规定的因素最多可以解释工程选择中的性别差距,即9.2%(即高中生准备,技能和职业态度方面的性别差异)。在研究领域的看法上,多达77%的性别差距可归因于性别差异。最后,1982年主修工程学的女性比男同龄人更有可能在1986年之前获得工程学学士学位。因此,有关妇女和工程教育的首要问题涉及妇女最初对工程计划的吸引力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Frehill-Rowe Lisa Marie.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1993
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号