首页> 外文OA文献 >The Contribution of Dissocial Personality Disorder to Cognition, Emotion Processing and Clinical Outcome in Violent Men with Psychosis.
【2h】

The Contribution of Dissocial Personality Disorder to Cognition, Emotion Processing and Clinical Outcome in Violent Men with Psychosis.

机译:社交性人格障碍对暴力性精神病患者认知,情绪处理和临床结果的贡献。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Research to date suggests that violent individuals with psychosis do not constitute a homogenous group, and subtypes of offender exist. One proposed subtype consists of people with comorbid antisocial personality traits, who constitute a significant proportion of individuals in forensic psychiatric services but have attracted little focussed research.This thesis aimed to characterise this comorbid group by examining the neuropsychological characteristics, emotion processing characteristics and clinical outcomes of male patients recruited from high-secure forensic psychiatric hospital, falling into one of the following diagnostic groups: 1. psychotic disorder (n=15); 2. dissocial personality disorder (DPD; n=17); and 3. comorbid psychosis and DPD (n=26). Clinical groups were compared to each other and to a group of healthy controls (n=30) on measures of neuropsychological functioning, facial affect recognition, sensorimotor gating and appetitive and defensive responding. In addition, the clinical groups were compared on their historical characteristics (offending, psychosocial, psychopathy) and current clinical outcomes, corresponding to clinician rated clinical progress, risk/violence and engagement with the clinical team. The relationship between the characterisation measures and outcomes (progress, risk and engagement) was explored to assess the clinical relevance of such indices.The results supported a distinct subgroup of those with comorbid psychosis and DPD, who were characterised by a poorer sensorimotor gating profile and poorer fearful facial affect recognition than their non-DPD counterparts, with a tendency towards poorer neurocognition. The comorbid group was more similar to the DPD alone group on experimental and historical measures. The clinical groups did not differ from each other, or healthy controls, on appetitive/defensive responding, and the clinical groups did not differ with respect to outcomes. Measures of memory, executive function and facial affect recognition correlated with indices of outcome, suggesting that such characteristics may be promising treatment targets within forensic mental health services.
机译:迄今为止的研究表明,患有精神病的暴力个体并不构成同质群体,并且存在罪犯亚型。一种拟议的亚型由具有共病的反社会人格特征的人组成,这些人在法医精神病学服务中占很大比例,但很少受到关注。本论文旨在通过研究神经心理特征,情绪处理特征和临床结果来表征该共病人群从高安全性法医精神病院招募的男性患者中,属于以下诊断组之一:1.精神病(n = 15); 2.社交性人格障碍(DPD; n = 17); 3.合并精神病和DPD(n = 26)。将临床组彼此进行比较,并与一组健康对照组(n = 30)进行神经心理学功能,面部表情识别,感觉运动门控以及食欲和防御反应的比较。此外,还比较了临床组的历史特征(违规,社会心理,精神病)和当前临床结局,这些结果与临床医生对临床进展的评估,风险/暴力程度以及与临床团队的参与程度相对应。探索了表征指标与结局(进展,风险和参与度)之间的关系,以评估这些指标的临床相关性。结果支持了精神病合并疾病和DPD的亚组,这些亚组的感觉运动门控特征较差,与非DPD对应者相比,可怕的面部表情识别能力较差,并具有较差的神经认知能力。在实验和历史测量上,合并症组与仅DPD组更为相似。临床组在食性/防御性反应方面没有差异,也没有健康对照,临床组在结局方面也没有差异。记忆,执行功能和面部表情识别的量度与结果指标相关,表明这些特征可能是法医精神卫生服务中有希望的治疗目标。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sedgwick Ottilie Louise;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号