首页> 外文OA文献 >Heritage without Heirs? : tangible and religious cultural heritage of the Vlach minority in Europe in the context of an interdisciplinary research project : (contribution to the subject)
【2h】

Heritage without Heirs? : tangible and religious cultural heritage of the Vlach minority in Europe in the context of an interdisciplinary research project : (contribution to the subject)

机译:没有继承人的遗产? :在跨学科研究项目的背景下,欧洲弗拉赫少数民族的有形和宗教文化遗产:(对此主题的贡献)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The revival of themes concerning UNESCO cultural heritage, which emerged at the end of the 20th century, poses many questions in reference to the need, essence, and discourse on the subject as well as are-as beyond it. One of these questions seems to be the cultural heritage of nationals communities in Europe, which were doomed to assimilation, persecution or even oblivion in the second part of the 20th century. In recent times, the critical research trend on cultural heritage has pointed out that the essence of heritage is a choice which transforms cultural achievements into “our heritage” – the areas of culture that we choose and often protect and pass on to the next generations. However, beyond “our protection,” there is a realm of “oblivion” which may include “alien” tangible and intangible objects about which we do not care, which do not matter to us and which we do not want to pass on to our heirs. It is a space of all forms of “our” degradation and marginalization of an “alien legacy,” a space where we often let this legacy become forgotten. It can be stated that the example of the Vlachs perfectly illustrates the complex processes related to cultures which were overwhelmingly subjugated by their neighbours and lost the fight. A neighbour, usually representing the culture of the majority, was stronger culturally, economically, politically and often militarily, too. The following article focuses on the phenomena which classical anthropology used to inspect, claiming that its role is to protect what is fading into oblivion. Thus, the analysis of the Vlach culture presented herein refers to a much wider reflection, which is a synergy of ethnography, ethnology and cultural anthropology, and to the critical studies on heritage which are emerging in Poland. This presentation will analyse the principal problems concerning research on the cultural heritage of displaced communities in Europe from the perspective of the Vlach minority. Based on the field research conducted in several countries of Europe (e.g. Greece, Macedonia, Romania, Ukraine, Slovakia and Poland), I will present the main classification of the Vlach tangible heritage with special attention paid to the most important cultural monuments, including religious building developments (churches, icons, small religious architecture). I will portray the difficulties found in protecting this heritage and the role of cultural institutions in its preservation and exposition.
机译:20世纪末出现的有关教科文组织文化遗产的主题的复兴,提出了关于该主题以及其本身的需求,实质和论述的许多问题。这些问题之一似乎是欧洲国民社区的文化遗产,在20世纪下半叶,它们注定要被同化,迫害甚至遗忘。近年来,对文化遗产的批判性研究趋势指出,遗产的实质是将文化成就转化为“我们的遗产”的选择,这是我们选择并经常保护并传给下一代的文化领域。但是,除了“我们的保护”之外,还有一个“遗忘”领域,其中可能包括“无关”的有形和无形物体,我们不在乎,对我们来说并不重要,我们也不想传递给我们继承人。它是各种形式的“我们的”退化和“外来遗产”的边缘化的空间,我们经常让这一遗忘被遗忘的空间。可以说,弗拉赫家族的例子完美地说明了与文化有关的复杂过程,这些文化被其邻国压倒性地压倒一切,并打败了他们。通常代表多数文化的邻居在文化,经济,政治和军事上也较强大。下一篇文章着重于古典人类学用来检验的现象,声称其作用是保护逐渐消失的事物。因此,本文介绍的弗拉赫文化的分析指的是更为广泛的反映,这是人种学,人种学和文化人类学的结合,也涉及波兰新兴的批判性研究。本演讲将从弗拉赫少数民族的角度分析有关欧洲流离失所者文化遗产研究的主要问题。根据在欧洲几个国家(例如希腊,马其顿,罗马尼亚,乌克兰,斯洛伐克和波兰)进行的实地研究,我将介绍弗拉赫有形遗产的主要分类,并特别关注包括宗教在内的最重要的文化古迹。建筑发展(教堂,圣像,小型宗教建筑)。我将描述在保护这一遗产方面发现的困难以及文化机构在其保存和展示中的作用。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kocój Ewa;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号