首页> 外文OA文献 >Prenotification in web-based access panel surveys: the influence of mobile text messaging versus e-mail on response rates and sample composition
【2h】

Prenotification in web-based access panel surveys: the influence of mobile text messaging versus e-mail on response rates and sample composition

机译:基于Web的访问面板调查中的预先通知:移动文本消息传递与电子邮件对响应率和样本构成的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

To compare the effectiveness of different prenotification and invitation procedures in a webbased three-wave access panel survey over 3 consecutive months, we experimentally varied the contact mode in a fully crossed two-factorial design with (a) three different prenotification conditions (mobile short messaging service [SMS], e-mail, no prenotice) and (b) two “invitation and reminder" conditions (SMS, e-mail). A group with nearly complete mobile phone coverage was randomly assigned to one of these six experimental conditions. As expected, SMS prenotifications outperformed e-mail prenotifications in terms of response rates across all three waves. Furthermore, e-mail invitation response rates outperformed those for SMS invitations. The combination of SMS prenotification and e-mail invitation performed best. The different experimental treatments did not have an effect on the sample composition of respondents between groups. (author's abstract)
机译:为了在连续3个月的基于网络的三波访问面板调查中比较不同预通知和邀请程序的有效性,我们在具有(a)三种不同预通知条件(移动短消息)的完全交叉两因素设计中实验性地更改了联系方式服务[SMS],电子邮件,没有预告)和(b)两个“邀请和提醒”条件(SMS,电子邮件),将手机覆盖范围几乎完全的一组随机分配给这六个实验条件之一。不出所料,在所有三个浪潮中,SMS预通知的响应率均优于电子邮件预通知;此外,电子邮件邀请的响应率均超过SMS邀请的响应率; SMS预通知和电子邮件邀请的组合效果最佳。处理对各组之间的受访者样本构成没有影响(作者的摘要)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号