首页> 外文OA文献 >How many testers are needed to assure the usability of medical devices?
【2h】

How many testers are needed to assure the usability of medical devices?

机译:需要多少测试员才能确保医疗设备的可用性?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Before releasing a product, manufacturers have to follow a regulatory framework and meet standards, producing reliable evidence that the device presents low levels of risk in use. There is, though, a gap between the needs of the manufacturers to conduct usability testing while managing their costs, and the requirements of authorities for representative evaluation data. A key issue here is the number of users that should complete this evaluation to provide confidence in a product's safety. This paper reviews the US FDA's indication that a sample composed of 15 participants per major group (or a minimum of 25 users) should be enough to identify 90-97% of the usability problems and argues that a more nuanced approach to determining sample size (which would also fit well with the FDA's own concerns) would be beneficial. The paper will show that there is no a priori cohort size that can guarantee a reliable assessment, a point stressed by the FDA in the appendices to its guidance, but that manufacturers can terminate the assessment when appropriate by using a specific approach - illustrated in this paper through a case study - called the 'Grounded Procedure'.
机译:在发布产品之前,制造商必须遵循法规框架并达到标准,以提供可靠的证据证明该设备的使用风险较低。但是,制造商在管理成本的同时进行可用性测试的需求与权威机构对代表性评估数据的要求之间存在差距。这里的关键问题是应完成此评估以对产品安全性充满信心的用户数量。本文回顾了美国FDA的指示,即每主要组由15名参与者组成的样本(或至少25位用户)应足以识别90%至97%的可用性问题,并认为确定样本大小的方法应更加细微(这也将非常适合FDA自身的担忧)。该文件将显示,没有先验队列可以保证可靠的评估,这是FDA在其指南的附录中强调的观点,但是制造商可以在适当的时候使用特定的方法终止评估-如本文所示通过案例研究撰写的论文-称为“地面程序”。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号