首页> 外文OA文献 >Steam-treated wood pellets: environmental and financial implications relative to fossil fuels and conventional pellets for electricity generation
【2h】

Steam-treated wood pellets: environmental and financial implications relative to fossil fuels and conventional pellets for electricity generation

机译:蒸汽处理的木屑颗粒:与化石燃料和常规颗粒用于发电相关的环境和财务影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Steam-treated pellets can help to address technical barriers that limit the uptake of pellets as a fuel for electricity generation, but there is limited understanding of the cost and environmental impacts of their production and use. This study investigates life cycle environmental (greenhouse gas (GHG) and air pollutant emissions) and financial implications of electricity generation from steam-treated pellets, including fuel cycle activities (biomass supply, pellet production, and combustion) and retrofit infrastructure to enable 100% pellet firing at a generating station that previously used coal. Models are informed by operating experience of pellet manufacturers and generating stations utilising coal, steam-treated and conventional pellets. Results are compared with conventional pellets and fossil fuels in a case study of electricity generation in northwestern Ontario, Canada. Steam-treated pellet production has similar GHG impacts to conventional pellets as their higher biomass feedstock requirement is balanced by reduced process electricity consumption. GHG reductions of more than 90% relative to coal and ~85% relative to natural gas (excluding retrofit infrastructure) could be obtained with both pellet options. Pellets can also reduce fuel cycle air pollutant emissions relative to coal by 30% (NOx), 97% (SOx), and 75% (PM10). Lesser retrofit requirements for steam-treated pellets more than compensate for marginally higher pellet production costs, resulting in lower electricity production cost compared to conventional pellets ($0.14/kWh vs. $0.16/kWh). Impacts of retrofit infrastructure become increasingly significant at lower generating station capacity factors, further favouring steam-treated pellets for both environmental and financial metrics.
机译:经蒸汽处理的颗粒可以帮助解决限制将颗粒用作发电燃料的技术障碍,但是对生产和使用成本和环境影响的了解有限。这项研究调查了生命周期环境(温室气体(GHG)和空气污染物的排放)以及经蒸汽处理的颗粒发电的财务影响,包括燃料循环活动(生物质供应,颗粒生产和燃烧)和改造基础设施以实现100%在以前使用煤炭的发电站进行颗粒燃烧。通过使用煤,蒸汽处理过的颗粒和常规颗粒的颗粒制造商和发电站的运行经验来提供模型信息。在加拿大安大略省西北部的一个发电案例研究中,将结果与常规颗粒和化石燃料进行了比较。蒸汽处理的颗粒生产对温室气体的影响与常规颗粒相似,因为它们对更高的生物量原料的需求可以通过减少工艺用电量来平衡。两种球团选件均可使相对于煤炭的GHG降低超过90%,相对于天然气约85%的降低(不包括改建基础设施)。相对于煤炭,药丸还可将燃料循环中的空气污染物排放量减少30%(NOx),97%(SOx)和75%(PM10)。蒸汽处理后的球团的改造要求较低,可以弥补球团生产成本的微不足道,与传统球团相比,电力生产成本更低($ 0.14 / kWh比$ 0.16 / kWh)。在发电站容量较低的情况下,改造基础设施的影响变得越来越重要,从环境和财务角度来看,它们都更倾向于采用蒸汽处理的颗粒。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号