首页> 外文OA文献 >REFINE (REducing Falls in In-patieNt Elderly) using bed and bedside chair pressure sensors linked to radio-pagers in acute hospital care: a randomised controlled trial
【2h】

REFINE (REducing Falls in In-patieNt Elderly) using bed and bedside chair pressure sensors linked to radio-pagers in acute hospital care: a randomised controlled trial

机译:使用与无线寻呼机相连的床和床头椅子压力传感器进行REFINE(减少住院中老年人的跌倒):一项随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: falls in hospitals are a major problem and contribute to substantial healthcare burden. Advances in sensor technology afford innovative approaches to reducing falls in acute hospital care. However, whether these are clinically effective and cost effective in the UK setting has not been evaluated. ududMethods: pragmatic, parallel-arm, individual randomised controlled trial of bed and bedside chair pressure sensors using radio-pagers (intervention group) compared with standard care (control group) in elderly patients admitted to acute, general medical wards, in a large UK teaching hospital. Primary outcome measure number of in-patient bedside falls per 1,000 bed days. ududResults: 1,839 participants were randomised (918 to the intervention group and 921 to the control group). There were 85 bedside falls (65 fallers) in the intervention group, falls rate 8.71 per 1,000 bed days compared with 83 bedside falls (64 fallers) in the control group, falls rate 9.84 per 1,000 bed days (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66–1.22; P = 0.51). There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to time to first bedside fall (adjusted hazard ratio (HR), 0.95; 95% CI: 0.67–1.34; P= 0.12). The mean cost per patient in the intervention group was £7199 compared with £6400 in the control group, mean difference in QALYs per patient, 0.0001 (95% CI: −0.0006–0.0004, P= 0.67). ududConclusions: bed and bedside chair pressure sensors as a single intervention strategy do not reduce in-patient bedside falls, time to first bedside fall and are not cost-effective in elderly patients in acute, general medical wards in the UK.
机译:背景:跌倒医院是一个主要问题,并给医疗保健负担沉重。传感器技术的进步提供了减少急性医院护理下降的创新方法。但是,尚未评估这些在英国的临床效果和成本效益。方法:对接受急性,普通医疗病房治疗的老年患者,采用无线电寻呼机(干预组)与标准护理(对照组)进行实用,平行臂的床和床旁压力传感器的随机对照试验。英国一家大型教学医院。每1,000个病床日住院病人床旁跌倒的主要结局指标。 ud ud结果:1,839名参与者被随机分组​​(干预组为918名,对照组为921名)。干预组有85个床旁跌倒(65个跌倒者),跌倒率为每1,000个床日8.71例,对照组为83个床旁跌倒(64个跌倒者),每1,000个床日跌倒率9.84(校正发生率,0.90; 95%置信区间[CI],0.66-1.22; P = 0.51)。两组在床旁第一次跌倒的时间方面无显着差异(调整后的危险比(HR)为0.95; 95%CI:0.67-1.34; P = 0.12)。干预组每名患者的平均费用为7199英镑,而对照组为6400英镑,每名患者的QALY平均差异为0.0001(95%CI:-0.0006-0.0004,P = 0.67)。结论:床和床头压力传感器作为一种单独的干预策略不能减少住院病人的床边跌落,第一次床边跌落的时间,并且在英国急性,普通医疗病房的老年患者中并不划算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号