首页> 外文OA文献 >Lines of (In)Convenience:Sovereignty and Border-Making in Postcolonial South Asia, 1947–1965
【2h】

Lines of (In)Convenience:Sovereignty and Border-Making in Postcolonial South Asia, 1947–1965

机译:便利性的分界线:后殖民南亚的主权和边界制造,1947年至1965年

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Border studies in South Asia privilege everyday experiences, and the constructed nature of borders and state sovereignty. This article argues that state elites in India, Pakistan and Afghanistan during the 1950s-60s actively pursued territorial sovereignty through border policy, having inherited ambiguous colonial-era frontiers. Comparing security and development activities along the Durand Line, between Afghanistan and Pakistan, with the better-known case of India and Pakistan’s ceasefire line in Kashmir, the article demonstrates that the exercise of sovereignty required a bounded space that only borders could provide and a rejection of competing border zone authorities. The local specificity of each border, however, created the historical conditions in which political elites acted. Combining an archival history methodology with conceptual insights from political geography and critical international relations, the article uses an original integration of two important Asian border spaces into one analysis in order to highlight tensions between sovereignty’s theory and practice.
机译:南亚的边境研究为人们的日常经历以及边境和国家主权的固有性质提供了特权。本文认为,在1950年代至60年代,印度,巴基斯坦和阿富汗的国家精英继承了模棱两可的殖民时代边界,并通过边界政策积极地追求领土主权。将阿富汗和巴基斯坦之间的杜兰德线沿线的安全与发展活动与克什米尔最著名的印度和巴基斯坦停火线进行比较,该文章表明,行使主权需要有边界的空间,只有边界才能提供和拒绝竞争的边境地区当局。但是,每个边界的地方特色创造了政治精英采取行动的历史条件。本文结合了档案历史方法论和政治地理学以及重要国际关系的概念性见解,将两个亚洲重要边界空间的原始整合整合到一个分析中,以强调主权理论与实践之间的紧张关系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号