首页> 外文OA文献 >VARIACIONES EN TORNO A LA RIQUEZA DE LA NADA: INFLUENCIA DEL PENSAMIENTO CHINO CLÁSICO Y EL BUDISMO ZEN EN LA POESIA DE JUAN L. ORTIZ, HUGO PADELETTI Y ARTURO CARRERAududududVARIACIONES EN TORNO A LA RIQUEZA DE LA NADA: INFLUENCIA DEL PENSAMIENTO CHINO CLÁSICO Y EL BUDISMO ZEN EN LA POESIA DE JUAN L. ORTIZ, HUGO PADELETTI Y ARTURO CARRERA
【2h】

VARIACIONES EN TORNO A LA RIQUEZA DE LA NADA: INFLUENCIA DEL PENSAMIENTO CHINO CLÁSICO Y EL BUDISMO ZEN EN LA POESIA DE JUAN L. ORTIZ, HUGO PADELETTI Y ARTURO CARRERAududududVARIACIONES EN TORNO A LA RIQUEZA DE LA NADA: INFLUENCIA DEL PENSAMIENTO CHINO CLÁSICO Y EL BUDISMO ZEN EN LA POESIA DE JUAN L. ORTIZ, HUGO PADELETTI Y ARTURO CARRERA

机译:虚无的财富周围的变化:古典思想和禅宗在胡安·奥蒂兹,雨果·帕德列蒂和阿图罗·卡雷拉诗歌中的影响您您您虚无的财富周围的变化:古典思想和禅宗在胡安·奥蒂兹,雨果·帕德列蒂和阿图罗·卡雷拉诗歌中的影响

摘要

This dissertation investigates how Juan L Ortiz (1896-1978), Hugo Padeletti (1928), and Arturo Carrera (1948), interpret and represent Chinese classical and Zen Buddhist systems of thinking in their poetry, in 20th century Argentina. I argue that these authors share a common aesthetical and philosophical goal in their interpretations of Chinese, and Japanese systems of thinking portrayed in their poetry. They are seeking philosophical and aesthetical alternatives to Eurocentric Modernity. In order to achieve this, these three authors lean in their poetry towards the dissolution of the self, passivity, contemplation, silence and exposure to the outside. Nonetheless, their interpretations of these Chinese and Japanese systems of thinking change relative to the way in which they react to historical, social, cultural and political events that shaped their cultural contexts. udMy investigation involves a close reading of the poetry of each author in the context of contemporary literary currents in 20th Century Argentina, in order to trace differences, and similarities, as well as individual specificities in their interpretations and representations of classical Chinese and Zen Buddhist verbal aesthetics and thought. The purpose of this research is to explore how, alongside during the 20th century, these Argentinian poets critique European Modernity in Argentina, through recurring to orientalism, as an alternative model to the Cartesian Rationalism and the other ideologies associated to the dominant discourse of progress.
机译:本文研究了20世纪阿根廷的Juan L Ortiz(1896-1978),Hugo Padeletti(1928)和Arturo Carrera(1948)如何在他们的诗歌中解释和代表中国古典和禅宗思想体系。我认为这些作者在对中文以及诗歌中描绘的日本思想体系的诠释中有着共同的美学和哲学目标。他们正在寻求欧洲中心现代性​​的哲学和美学替代。为了实现这一目标,这三位作者的诗歌倾向于自我的消散,消极,沉思,沉默和对外界的暴露。但是,他们对这些中日思想体系的解释相对于他们对塑造其文化背景的历史,社会,文化和政治事件做出反应的方式而改变。 ud我的调查涉及在20世纪阿根廷的当代文学思潮背景下仔细阅读每位作者的诗歌,以追溯他们对古典中国和禅宗佛教徒的解释和表征中的差异,相似之处以及个体特色。语言美学和思想。这项研究的目的是探索在20世纪的同时,这些阿根廷诗人如何通过反复出现东方主义来批判阿根廷的欧洲现代性,以此作为笛卡尔理性主义和与进步的主流话语相关的其他意识形态的替代模型。

著录项

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:33:42

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号