首页> 外文OA文献 >The changing face of protests in the digital age: on occupying cyberspace and Distributed-Denial-of-Services (DDoS) attacks.
【2h】

The changing face of protests in the digital age: on occupying cyberspace and Distributed-Denial-of-Services (DDoS) attacks.

机译:数字时代抗议活动的变化面孔:占领网络空间和分布式拒绝服务(DDoS)攻击。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

On 7th January 2013 the Anonymous hacking collective launched a White House petition asking the Obama administration to recognize DDoS1 attacks as a valid form of protest, similar to the Occupy protests. The ‘Occupy’ movement against financial inequality has become an international protest phenomenon stirring up the debate on the legal responses to acts of civil disobedience. At the same time, online attacks in the form of DDoS are considered by many as the digital counterparts of protesting. While the law generally acknowledges a certain level of protection for protesting as a manifestation of the rights to free speech and free assembly, it is still unclear whether DDoS attacks could qualify as free speech. This paper examines the analogies between offline protests and DDoS attacks, discusses legal responses in both casesudand seeks to explore the scope for free speech protection.
机译:2013年1月7日,匿名黑客团体发起白宫请愿,要求奥巴马政府将DDoS1攻击视为一种有效的抗议形式,类似于“占领”抗议。反对金融不平等的“占领”运动已成为一种国际抗议现象,激起了关于对公民抗命行为的法律回应的辩论。同时,许多人认为DDoS形式的在线攻击是抗议的数字形式。尽管法律普遍承认对抗议的某种程度的保护是言论自由和集会权利的体现,但仍不清楚DDoS攻击是否可以视为言论自由。本文研究了离线抗议与DDoS攻击之间的类比,讨论了这两种情况下的法律对策 udand试图探索言论自由保护的范围。

著录项

  • 作者

    Karanasiou Argyro;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号