首页> 外文OA文献 >Reflections on Perceived Online Service Quality:Structure, Antecedents, Ontology, Theory andMeasurement
【2h】

Reflections on Perceived Online Service Quality:Structure, Antecedents, Ontology, Theory andMeasurement

机译:关于感知在线服务质量的思考:结构,前因,本体论,理论和测量

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Online services are becoming increasingly ubiquitous, and this growth has beenaccompanied by increased business interest in measuring and managing onlineservice quality. This interest is also reflected in a large number of academic studies.Despite this, there is very little consensus about the dimensions and antecedents ofperceived online service quality (POLSQ).We consider two possible reasons for this: first that the phenomenon of online servicequality is changing as new technology affordances arise, so instability in thedimensionality would be a result of changes in the underlying phenomenon. Second,the theoretical approach and assumptions that studies of online service quality areusually founded on is flawed.My research questions are: 1) what is the structure of perceived online servicequality? 2) What are the antecedents of perceived online service quality? 3) What isthe ontology of perceived online service quality? 4) What are the most appropriatemodelling and measurement methods for measuring online service qualityquantitatively, and what insights can be gained from psychometrics?5) What insightsdoes this offer IS researchers for the measurement of user attitudes and perceptionstowards technologies?We find that leading models and instruments tend to be based on exploratory factoranalysis and have not been informed by advances in measurement theory, particularlyco-variance-based structural equation models, and a sub-set of those models knownas multi-indicator structural models.We apply recent advances in measurement theory to a dataset. We apply and comparefour different modelling methods, exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factoranalysis, formative models, and multi-indicator structural models, and discuss thetheoretical foundations of each method.We conclude that POLSQ may not have a separate ontology as a multi-dimensionalconstruct, but overall affect towards the service quality of a website is likely to be theresult of the perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived trust towardsthe service. This finding supports the explanatory power of information systemstheories over marketing and consumer behaviour theories when studying thisphenomenon. We find that user's perceptions of detailed affordances of the service,such as the relevance and timeliness of the information are antecedent to overallaffect towards the service, rather than being additional dimensions of POLSQ.We find that widely used techniques such as exploratory factor analysis have seriousdrawbacks. We find that multi-indicator structural models provide an accurate andnuanced method for modelling the formation of attitudes and perceptions towardstechnology, which is also well-grounded in theory from social psychology.Finally, we suggest that the approach we take to measuring POLSQ is has potentialvalue for other research which aims to measure customer attitudes and perceptionstowards technologies.
机译:在线服务变得越来越普遍,并且这种增长伴随着对测量和管理在线服务质量的商业兴趣的增加。这种兴趣也反映在大量的学术研究中,尽管如此,人们对感知在线服务质量(POLSQ)的规模和前提还没有达成共识,我们考虑了两个可能的原因:首先,在线服务质量现象是随着新技术能力的兴起而发生变化,因此维度的不稳定性将是潜在现象变化的结果。其次,通常基于在线服务质量研究的理论方法和假设是有缺陷的。我的研究问题是:1)感知的在线服务质量的结构是什么? 2)感知在线服务质量的前提是什么? 3)感知在线服务质量的本体是什么? 4)定量测量在线服务质量的最合适的建模和测量方法是什么,可以从心理计量学中获得哪些见解?5)IS研究人员为用户态度和感知技术的测量提供了哪些见解?我们发现领先的模型和工具往往是基于探索性因素分析,并未被测量理论的进展所告知,尤其是基于协方差的结构方程模型以及这些模型的子集(称为多指标结构模型)。我们将测量理论的最新进展应用于数据集。我们应用和比较了四种不同的建模方法,探索性因子分析,确认性因子分析,形成模型和多指标结构模型,并讨论了每种方法的理论基础。我们得出结论,POLSQ可能没有作为多维构建体的独立本体,但是对网站服务质量的总体影响可能是感知到的有用性,感知到的易用性以及感知到的对服务的信任度的结果。这一发现支持了信息系统理论对市场现象和消费者行为理论的解释力。我们发现用户对服务的详细能力的感知(例如信息的相关性和及时性)是对服务整体影响的先决条件,而不是POLSQ的附加维度。我们发现,探索性因素分析等广泛使用的技术存在严重缺陷。我们发现,多指标结构模型提供了一种对技术态度和看法形成模型的准确而细致的方法,这在社会心理学的理论上也有扎实的基础。最后,我们认为衡量POLSQ的方法具有潜在价值其他旨在衡量客户态度和对技术的看法的研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Tate Mary;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_NZ
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号