首页> 外文OA文献 >Aid, Sanctions and Civil Society: An Analysis of the Impacts of Targeted Sanctions on Fiji’sNon-Government Organisations
【2h】

Aid, Sanctions and Civil Society: An Analysis of the Impacts of Targeted Sanctions on Fiji’sNon-Government Organisations

机译:援助,制裁与公民社会:针对性制裁对斐济制裁的影响分析非政府组织

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

In dealing with contested regimes, international aid donors must decide whether to suspendor continue to provide development assistance to a regime considered illegitimate. Sincethe 1990s a general consensus has existed that conventional sanctions are largelyineffective and essentially violate human rights. Responding to this realisation, targeted or‘smart’ sanctions emerged with the aim of minimising the impacts of sanctions on civilians,while still targeting the ruling elite. This thesis investigates smart sanctions utilised in aPacific Island country: Fiji. Following the coups of 1987, 2000 and 2006 three of Fiji’smajor aid donors, Australia, New Zealand and the European Union, imposed various levelsof smart sanctions including targeted travel bans and sanctioning their aid programmes. Inparticular, the donors focused on redirecting funding through non-governmentalorganisations (NGOs) in Fiji.Within the sanctions literature a particular gap exists regarding assessment of the impactson local NGOs. What research does exists has shown that in several cases in Africa, Asiaand South America when donors have chosen to channel aid through civil society inresponse to lagging political reforms, this has at times done more harm than good for localNGOs. Since the imposition of smart sanctions in Fiji there has been no evaluation of howrechanneling aid through NGOs has changed the local development landscape. Thisresearch evaluates both the explicit and implicit impacts that smart sanctions imposed onFiji have had on local NGOs.
机译:在与有争议的政权打交道时,国际援助捐助者必须决定是否暂停或继续向被认为是非法的政权提供发展援助。自1990年代以来,人们普遍达成共识,认为常规制裁在很大程度上是无效的,并且实质上侵犯了人权。为响应这种认识,出现了有针对性或“聪明”的制裁,目的是将制裁对平民的影响降至最低,同时仍以统治精英为目标。本文研究了太平洋岛国斐济采取的明智制裁措施。在1987年,2000年和2006年政变之后,斐济的三个主要援助捐助国,澳大利亚,新西兰和欧洲联盟实施了各种级别的精明制裁,包括有针对性的旅行禁令和制裁其援助计划。特别是,捐助者着重于通过斐济的非政府组织(NGOs)转移资金。在制裁文献中,在评估当地非政府组织的影响方面存在特殊差距。现有的研究表明,在非洲,亚洲和南美的一些情况下,捐助者选择通过民间社会提供援助,以响应落后的政治改革,这有时对当地非政府组织造成的弊大于利。自从斐济实行明智制裁以来,没有评估过通过非政府组织提供的如何重新分配援助的方式改变了当地的发展前景。这项研究评估了对斐济实施的明智制裁对当地非政府组织的显性和隐性影响。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hanks Morgan Franciska;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_NZ
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号