首页> 外文OA文献 >Shaykh succession in Turkish Sufi lineages (19th and 20th centuries): conflicts, reforms and transmission of spiritual enlightenment (The Tariqa's cohesional power and the Shaykhhood succession question)
【2h】

Shaykh succession in Turkish Sufi lineages (19th and 20th centuries): conflicts, reforms and transmission of spiritual enlightenment (The Tariqa's cohesional power and the Shaykhhood succession question)

机译:土耳其苏菲家族(19世纪和20世纪)中的谢赫人继承:冲突,改革和精神启蒙的传播(塔里卡的凝聚力和谢赫德继承问题)

摘要

This article examines the question of the succession of the Sufi shaykhs as heads of a lodge (tekke) or as great masters of a lineage (brotherhood) in the Ottoman Empire in 19th and 20th centuries and shows that there was an important difference between the rule of hereditary succession followed by the tekkes from the beginning of Ottoman history to the classical period (16th-17th century) and the same rule which spread in the 19th century. This study investigates the two principles upon which the legitimacy for succession is established and the heated controversies and quarrels around it. These two principles are: 1. hereditary succession (evladiyet in Ottoman Turkish), which was in general the rule within Sufi s orders; and, 2. succession by discipleship, on grounds of learning or other merits. This study demonstrates that the principle of hereditary succession was well cultivated in the Centralized Sufi Orders (Mevleviye, and Bektaşiye) and in some Mother-Lodges of other lineages (e.g. Kâdiriye), and that there were some famous Sufi families which had strengthened this principle and became genuine spiritual dynasties (e.g. Mevlevî, Halvetî). Conversely, some Sufi lineages, like the Nakşibendiye, were inclined to favour the succession by discipleship. The second section of this study focuses on the drastic contestation of the principle of hereditary succession by openminded and reformist Sufi s since the beginning of the 19th century and particularly in the fi rst decades of the 20th century. It analyses the reform of the hereditary succession, especially the measures adopted by several organisations, like the "Council of Shaykhs" (Meclis-i Meşayih) in the mid-19th century, and the project, never implemented, of a "Sufi School" (Medresetü'l-Meşayih) for the education of the sons of the Shaykhs in the beginning of the 20th century.
机译:本文研究了19世纪和20世纪奥斯曼帝国以苏克·谢赫人为住所首领(tekke)或世系大师(兄弟身份)的继承问题,并显示出该规则之间存在重要差异从奥斯曼帝国的历史开始到古典时期(16-17世纪)的世袭,随后是19世纪传播的相同规则。这项研究调查了确立继承合法性以及围绕它的激烈争议和争执的两个原则。这两个原则是:1.世袭继承(奥斯曼土耳其语中的evladiyet),通常是苏菲下达的命令; 2.以学习或其他优点为基础,由门徒继任。这项研究表明,世袭继承的原则在中央苏菲教团(Mevleviye和Bektaşiye)和其他宗族的母亲住所(例如Kâdiriye)中得到了很好的培养,并且有一些著名的苏菲家族加强了这一原则并成为真正的精神王朝(例如梅夫廖夫,哈尔维特)。相反,一些苏菲派系,例如纳基西本耶(Nakşibendiye),倾向于通过门徒训练来继承。本研究的第二部分集中于自19世纪初以来,特别是在20世纪前几十年,思想开放和改革派苏菲派对世袭继承原则的激烈争论。它分析了世袭继承的改革,特别是一些组织采取的措施,例如19世纪中叶的“谢赫克委员会”(Meclis-iMeşayih),以及从未实施的“苏菲派”项目。 (Medresetü'l-Meşayih)在20世纪初为谢赫教徒的儿子们提供教育。

著录项

  • 作者

    Zarcone Thierry;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-20 20:31:20

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号