首页> 外文OA文献 >Collective Memory Embodied in Poetry as Poison. The Mnemonic Role of Romantic Poets Discussed on the Basis of Adam Mickiewicz’ Konrad Wallenrod and Forefathers (Part III)
【2h】

Collective Memory Embodied in Poetry as Poison. The Mnemonic Role of Romantic Poets Discussed on the Basis of Adam Mickiewicz’ Konrad Wallenrod and Forefathers (Part III)

机译:集体记忆在诗中体现为毒药。以亚当·米基维奇的康拉德·沃伦罗德和祖父为基础讨论浪漫主义诗人的助记符作用(第三部分)

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis constitutes an interdisciplinary approach to the Polish Romanticism combining literature studies with memory studies, nationalism research and psychoanalysis. This phenomenon-based study attempts to answer the question, how the Polish national poet Adam Mickiewicz (1798–1855) – or more exactly the implied authors in his works – perceived the role of poetry in mnemonic terms and how it changes in course of time. Consequently, ‘memory in literature’ (Astrin Erll and Ansger Nünning) is discussed here.Two pieces of writing by Mickiewicz – Konrad Wallenrod [1828] and the third part of Forefathers [1832], where a bard respectively a poetic genius appears – are seen as meta-texts defining goals of poets in time of the political non-existence of a state. Poetry is supposed to keep memory of the glorious past alive, kindle the love for the motherland, support the collective identity of a group and initiate a liberation movement. Poets function as memory guards, leaders of the nation and prophets. Thus, literature is a medium of collective memory – it stores crucial contents, transmits them and acts as a cue.Nevertheless, shifting the focus from the community towards well-being of individuals, which is consistent with the postmodern thinking, the impact that poetry has on members of a given memory culture (Jan Assmann) can be described in ‘vampiric’ terms (Maria Janion). Poetry embodying collective memory may be compared to ‘poison’, ‘infecting’ people with a nationalistic way of thinking to their disadvantage as far as their personal lives are concerned.
机译:本论文构成了波兰浪漫主义的一种跨学科方法,将文学研究与记忆研究,民族主义研究和精神分析相结合。这项基于现象的研究试图回答这样一个问题:波兰民族诗人亚当·米基维兹(Adam Mickiewicz(1798–1855)),或者更确切地说是其作品中的隐含作者,如何以助记符的方式理解诗歌的作用,以及诗歌随时间的变化。因此,这里讨论了“文学中的记忆”(阿斯特林·厄尔和安斯格·宁宁)。米基维奇的两篇作品–康拉德·沃伦罗德[1828]和《祖先》的第三部分[1832],分别出现了诗人和诗人。被视为在国家不存在时确定诗人目标的元文本。诗歌应该保留光荣的过去,激发对祖国的热爱,支持一个群体的集体身份,并发起解放运动。诗人起着记忆守卫,国家领导人和先知的作用。因此,文学是集体记忆的媒介,它存储着重要的内容,传播它们并充当提示。尽管如此,文学的重心从社区转移到个人的幸福上,这与后现代思想,诗歌的影响是一致的。给定记忆文化的成员(Jan Assmann)可以用“吸血鬼”来形容(Maria Janion)。体现集体记忆的诗歌可以与“毒药”相提并论,它以民族主义的方式“感染”人们,使他们在生活中处于不利地位。

著录项

  • 作者

    Teperek Agata Anna;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号