首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of treatment outcomes in severe personality disorder patients with or without substance use disorders: a 36-month prospective pragmatic follow-up study.
【2h】

Comparison of treatment outcomes in severe personality disorder patients with or without substance use disorders: a 36-month prospective pragmatic follow-up study.

机译:患有或不患有药物滥用疾病的严重人格障碍患者的治疗结果比较:一项为期36个月的前瞻性实用随访研究。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: Concurrent personality disorder (PD) and substance use disorder (SUD) are common in clinical practice. However, SUD is the main criterion for study exclusion in most psychotherapeutic studies of PD. As a result, data on treatment outcomes in patients with concurrent PD/SUD are scarce. Methods: The study sample consisted of 51 patients diagnosed with severe PD and admitted for psychotherapeutic treatment as a part of routine mental health care. All patients were diagnosed with PD according to the Structured Clinical Interview for PD. Patients were further assessed (DSM-IV diagnostic criteria) to check for the presence of concurrent SUD, with 28 patients diagnosed with both disorders (PD-SUD). These 28 cases were then compared to the 23 patients without SUD (PD-nSUD) in terms of psychiatric hospitalizations and psychiatric emergency room (ER) visits before and during the 6-month therapeutic intervention and every 6 months thereafter for a total of 36 months. Results: The baseline clinical characteristics correspond to a sample of PD patients (78% met DSM-IV criteria for borderline PD) with poor general functioning and a high prevalence of suicide attempts and self-harm behaviors. Altogether, the five outcome variables - the proportion and the number of psychiatric inpatient admissions, the number of days hospitalized, and the proportion and the number of psychiatric ER visits - improved significantly during the treatment period, and this improvement was maintained throughout the follow-up period. Although PD-SUD patients had more psychiatric hospitalizations and ER visits than PD-nSUD patients during follow-up, the differences between these two groups remained stable over the study period indicating that the treatment was equally effective in both groups. Conclusion: Specialized psychotherapy for severe PD can be effectively applied in patients with concurrent PD-SUD under usual practice conditions. These findings suggest that exclusion of patients with dual disorders from specialized treatments is unjustified.
机译:背景:并发性人格障碍(PD)和物质使用障碍(SUD)在临床实践中很常见。但是,SUD是大多数PD治疗心理研究中排除研究的主要标准。结果,并发PD / SUD患者的治疗结果数据很少。方法:该研究样本包括51名诊断为严重PD并接受心理治疗作为常规精神卫生保健一部分的患者。根据针对PD的结构性临床访谈,所有患者均被诊断为PD。对患者进行了进一步评估(DSM-IV诊断标准),以检查并发SUD的存在,其中28例患者被诊断患有两种疾病(PD-SUD)。然后,将这28例患者与23例无SUD(PD-nSUD)的患者在6个月治疗干预之前和期间进行精神科住院治疗和精神科急诊室就诊进行比较,之后每6个月进行一次,共36个月。结果:基线临床特征对应于PD患者样本(78%符合DSM-IV临界PD的标准),这些患者的一般功能差,自杀未遂和自残行为的发生率很高。总的来说,五个结果变量-精神科住院病人的比例和数量,住院天数以及精神科ER诊治的比例和次数-在治疗期间显着改善,并且在随后的整个过程中一直保持这种改善-上升期。尽管在随访期间,PD-SUD患者比PD-nSUD患者有更多的精神病住院和急诊就诊,但在研究期间,两组之间的差异保持稳定,表明两组的治疗效果均相同。结论:针对重度PD的特殊心理治疗可以在通常的实践条件下有效地用于合并PD-SUD的患者。这些发现表明,将双重疾病患者排除在专门治疗之外是不合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号