首页> 外文OA文献 >Innovation in open and distance learning and teacher education: the case of pre-service secondary vocational education and training at an Australian Regional university
【2h】

Innovation in open and distance learning and teacher education: the case of pre-service secondary vocational education and training at an Australian Regional university

机译:远程学习和教师教育方面的创新:澳大利亚地区大学的职前中等职业教育和培训

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

[Abstract]: Debate continues about the appropriateness of open and distance learning as a delivery mode for teacher education. Nevertheless, as with other manifestations of open and distance learning, there is a growing recognition that the potential flexibility afforded by new communication technologies can be aligned with new approaches to curriculum, pedagogy and assessment to provide educational opportunities to prospective and/or current teachers who would otherwise not be able to attain such opportunities.udDespite these distinctive advantages, the pressure on open and distance learning approaches to teacher education is undoubtedly greater than with face-to-face models, not least because the latter constitute the default mode of formal education. UNESCO’s recent report Teacher education guidelines: Using open and distance learning: Technology, curriculum, cost, evaluation (Perraton, Creed & Robinson, 2002) provides a useful synthesis of the main elements of this pressure.udThis paper takes up that challenge in relation to a program of pre-service secondary vocational education and training teacher education (itself often considered marginal to ‘academic’ or ‘general’ secondary teacher education) at Central Queensland University, an Australian regional university. The program is interrogated from the perspective of three of the UNESCO report’s principal concerns: planning; technology; and teaching practice. Denning’s (2004) recent distinction between innovation as a novel idea and as a transformation of practice is used to argue that the program is an educational innovation in both of Denning’s applications of the term, with significant implications for understanding and valuing open and distance learning and teacher education in the early 21st century.
机译:[摘要]:关于开放和远程学习是否适合作为教师教育的交付方式的争论仍在继续。然而,与开放和远程学习的其他表现形式一样,人们越来越认识到,新的通信技术所提供的潜在灵活性可以与课程,教学法和评估的新方法相结合,从而为未来和/或当前的教师提供教育机会。 ud尽管具有这些独特的优势,但毫无疑问,开放和远程学习方法对教师教育的压力要比面对面的模式更大,这尤其是因为后者构成了正式的默认模式教育。联合国教科文组织最近的报告《教师教育准则:使用开放和远程学习:技术,课程,费用,评估》(Perraton,Creed和Robinson,2002年)对这种压力的主要因素进行了有益的综合。 ud参加澳大利亚昆士兰州中央大学的职前中等职业教育和师范教育计划(其本身通常被认为对“学术”或“普通”中学教师教育而言是微不足道的)。从教科文组织报告的三个主要关切的角度审视了该计划:规划;技术;和教学实践。丹宁(2004)最近将创新作为一种新颖的想法与作为一种实践的转变之间的区别被认为该程序是丹宁在该术语应用中的一项教育创新,对理解和评估开放和远程学习以及21世纪初的教师教育。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号