首页> 外文OA文献 >Alternative solutions to traditional approaches to risk analysis and decision making using fuzzy logic
【2h】

Alternative solutions to traditional approaches to risk analysis and decision making using fuzzy logic

机译:使用模糊逻辑的传统风险分析和决策方法的替代解决方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Fuzzy set theory (FST) and Fuzzy logic (FL) are one of the main components of soft computing which is a collection of techniques to handle hard problems in which the application of traditional approaches fails. The father of FST and FL stated that the dominant aim of SC is to exploit the tolerance for imprecision and uncertainty to achieve tractability, robustness, and low solution cost. Since its establishment the theory of fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic became very popular and received much attention especiallyudduring the last decade being applied in many different fields. The wide use of fuzzy controllers in many massproduced products resulted in the increase of research in fuzzy set theory and fuzzy logic. In this thesis we use the techniques that are based on FL and FST for risk analysis and risk-based decision making. There are several reasons for using FL and FST. Fuzzy logic is a true extension of conventional logic: thus anything that was built using conventional design techniques can be built withudfuzzy logic. Another advantage is that it is close to humanudreasoning, and it is easy to understand for the users who doudnot have strong mathematical knowledge. A fuzzy system allows the user to use and to reason with words instead of crisp numbers. In addition, FL also offers a wide range of operators to perform efficient combinations of fuzzy predicates. In this thesis we propose alternative solutions to the existing approaches that use FL and FST for risk analysis and risk-based decision making. We investigated the current approaches, and we actually found that there exists only a small amount of researches that focus on risk analysis by using fuzzy logic. As far as we found, there are very few approaches that are generic and representative enough to be applied generally and to be used for complex problems. The existing approaches are very specific, targeting a particular area concentrating on specific types of risks. In this thesis we propose several different frameworks and algorithms based on FST and FL. First, we introduce two algorithms to rank the generalized fuzzyudnumbers. The main reason for developing a new ranking algorithm is that the existing ranking algorithms have some disadvantages that make them not suitable for risk assessment and decision making. We used our algorithms in risk-aware decision making related to the choice of alternatives. Second, we introduce a pessimistic approach to assess the impact of risk factors on the overall risk. The methods that use the fuzzy weighted average often give a lower result than the real risk especially in the case of a large amount of input variables. Furthermore, the traditional approaches of using fuzzy inference systems may give the same result for different cases depending on the choice of the defuzzification method. For the pessimistic approach we used our developed algorithms of ranking generalized fuzzy numbers. Next we propose the use of Fuzzy Bayesian Networks (FBNs) for risk assessment. While there is a considerable number of studies for Bayesian networks (BNs) for risk analysis and decision making, as far as we found there is not a study to make use of FBNs even though FBNs seem more appropriate and straightforward to use for risk analysis and risk assessment. In general, there is only a small amount of studies about FBNs, and not in many application fields. The last approach discussed in this thesis is the use of Fuzzy Cognitive Maps (FCMs) for risk analysis and decision making. We propose a new framework for group decision making in risk analysis using Extended FCMs. In addition we developed a new type of FCMs, Belief Degree Distributed FCMs, and we show its use for decision making.
机译:模糊集理论(FST)和模糊逻辑(FL)是软计算的主要组成部分,软计算是处理传统方法应用失败的难题的技术集合。 FST和FL的父亲表示,SC的主要目标是利用对不精确性和不确定性的容忍度,以实现可处理性,鲁棒性和较低的解决方案成本。自从建立以来,模糊集和模糊逻辑的理论就非常流行并受到了广泛的关注,尤其是在近十年来被应用到许多不同领域的时候。模糊控制器在许多量产产品中的广泛应用导致对模糊集理论和模糊逻辑的研究不断增加。在本文中,我们使用基于FL和FST的技术进行风险分析和基于风险的决策。使用FL和FST有多个原因。模糊逻辑是常规逻辑的真正扩展:因此,使用常规设计技术构建的任何事物都可以使用 udfuzzy逻辑构建。另一个优点是它接近人为推理,并且对不懂数学的用户很容易理解。模糊系统允许用户使用单词而不是清晰的数字进行推理。此外,FL还提供了广泛的运算符来执行模糊谓词的有效组合。在本文中,我们提出了使用FL和FST进行风险分析和基于风险的决策的现有方法的替代解决方案。我们研究了当前的方法,实际上发现只有少量研究集中在使用模糊逻辑进行风险分析上。据我们发现,几乎没有什么方法能通用且具有代表性,足以普遍应用并用于复杂问题。现有的方法非常具体,针对的是专注于特定类型风险的特定领域。本文提出了几种基于FST和FL的框架和算法。首先,我们引入两种算法对广义模糊 udnumber进行排序。开发新的排名算法的主要原因是现有的排名算法具有一些缺点,使其不适合进行风险评估和决策。我们将算法用于与替代选择有关的风险意识决策中。其次,我们引入一种悲观的方法来评估风险因素对整体风险的影响。使用模糊加权平均的方法通常得出的结果要比实际风险低,尤其是在输入变量数量较大的情况下。此外,根据模糊化方法的选择,使用模糊推理系统的传统方法在不同情况下可能会得出相同的结果。对于悲观的方法,我们使用了我们开发的对广义模糊数进行排名的算法。接下来,我们建议使用模糊贝叶斯网络(FBN)进行风险评估。尽管针对贝叶斯网络(BN)进行风险分析和决策的研究很多,但就我们发现而言,尽管FBN似乎更适合和直接用于风险分析和研究,但仍没有一项研究可以利用FBN。风险评估。通常,关于FBN的研究很少,而在许多应用领域中却很少。本文讨论的最后一种方法是将模糊认知图(FCM)用于风险分析和决策。我们为使用扩展FCM进行风险分析的团队决策提出了一个新框架。另外,我们开发了一种新型的FCM,即“信念度分布FCM”,并展示了其在决策中的用途。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mkrtchyan Lusine;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号