首页> 外文OA文献 >IPA capture at the lithographic printing press.
【2h】

IPA capture at the lithographic printing press.

机译:在平版印刷机上捕获IPA。

摘要

The release of volatile organic compounds to the atmosphere is harmful to human health and the environment. The printing industry is one of the highest contributors to VOC emissions in the UK. According to the Solvent Emissions Directive (1999), only 30 % (by weight) or less of solvents used in the printing industry can be released into the atmosphere as emissions; this is proving to be a challenge to the industry. Thus, the aim of this project is to develop and test a complete demonstration scale capture and regeneration system capable of reusing both, the adsorbent and the adsorbed VOC (in this case IPA).ududA prototype adsorber was built and tested at a lithographic printing company for the purpose of capturing the isopropanol (IPA) emissions, under industrial conditions. The prototype itself consisted of an extractor pipe and an adsorbent cartridge placed inside a vacuum cleaner. Adsorption was carried out by drawing in air from the printing machines where vapour emitted from the dampening solution (which comprised of about 10% by vol IPA andud90% by vol water) was concentrated. Three trials of varying inlet concentrations with an adsorbent Dowex Optipore V503 (Dow) and a one trial with activated carbon (AC), was carried out at the printing facility. The time taken until the start of breakthrough was approximately 86 minutes and 250 minutes (of printing time) for Dow and AC respectively. Results showed that, until the start of breakthrough, all of the IPA entering the bed had beenudcaptured by both adsorbents. Of the material captured on the adsorbent, the percentage that was IPA for Dow was 66 wt% to 80 wt% and the IPA percentage that was captured on AC was 54 wt%. The rest of the captured material on the adsorbents was found to be water. A higher IPA loading, however, was evident for AC as compared to Dow.ududResults on microwave (MW) regenerating the two adsorbents showed that maximum regeneration of 88% for Dow and 97% for AC occurred after 12 and 13.5 minutes of microwave irradiation respectively. Tiny flashes of light across and within the whole AC bed were evident frequently during the initial stages of MW regeneration. Thus, in terms of safety, the existence of tiny sparks during AC regeneration indicates that Dow is the safer of the two adsorbents. Fractional regeneration of Dow showed that maximum IPA content was found in the regenerate collected between the 6th and 9th minute while the lowest IPA content was found between 0 and 3 minutes. For AC, the percentage of IPA in the regenerate was also found to increase with irradiation time.ududAn attempt was made to model the process. The first step was to obtain the pure adsorption isotherms at 298 K using an Intelligent Gravimetric Analyser (IGA). For the AC and Dow adsorbents, the Toth and the CIMF model fitted extremely well to the pure IPA and water isotherms respectively. The mixture isotherms were described by the virial equation. The results from the mixture experiments involving Dow showed ideal adsorption of the mixture; AC showed highly non-ideal behaviour. A mathematical model (compiled on Matlab), which incorporated the co-adsorption isotherms, was used to predict breakthrough times during fixed-bed adsorption. This model was able to predict breakthrough data for Dow fairly accurately.ududAn economic analysis was conducted which shows that AC is the cheaper of the two adsorbents to use, subject to safety considerations.ududOverall, a system that captures and regenerates the IPA from the print works had been successfully developed and tested. Microwave regeneration was found to be favourable for both adsorbents since, no loss in adsorbent capacity was found after exposure to microwave radiation. On comparing the two adsorbents, Dow was found to capture a higher percentage of IPA than water as compared to AC. However, with regards to economic viability, AC was found to be the more economic adsorbent.
机译:挥发性有机化合物释放到大气中对人体健康和环境有害。印刷业是英国VOC排放量最大的贡献者之一。根据《溶剂排放指令》(1999年),仅30%(按重量计)或更少的印刷行业所用溶剂可以作为排放物排放到大气中;事实证明,这对行业构成挑战。因此,该项目的目的是开发和测试一个完整的示范规模的捕集和再生系统,该系统能够重用吸附剂和吸附的VOC(在本例中为IPA)。 ud ud平版印刷公司,目的是在工业条件下捕获异丙醇(IPA)排放物。原型本身由一个抽气管和一个放置在真空吸尘器中的吸附剂盒组成。通过从印刷机吸入空气来进行吸附,在印刷机中从润湿溶液散发出的蒸气(由约10%的IPA体积和 ud90%的水构成)被浓缩。在印刷厂进行了使用吸附剂Dowex Optipore V503(Dow)改变入口浓度的三项试验,以及使用活性炭(AC)的一项试验。陶氏化学和AC直到突破开始为止所花费的时间分别约为86分钟和250分钟(印刷时间)。结果表明,直到突破之前,所有进入床的IPA都被两种吸附剂捕获。在吸附剂上捕获的材料中,Dow的IPA百分比为66 wt%至80 wt%,而AC捕获的IPA百分比为54 wt%。发现吸附剂上捕获的其余材料是水。然而,与Dow相比,AC的IPA含量更高。 ud ud微波(MW)再生两种吸附剂的结果表明,陶氏在12和13.5分钟后发生最大再生,陶氏88%,AC 97%。分别进行微波照射。在兆瓦级再生的初始阶段,整个交流床上和整个交流床内部经常出现微小的闪光。因此,就安全性而言,交流再生期间存在微小火花,这表明陶氏化学是两种吸附剂中较安全的一种。陶氏的部分再生表明,在第6和9分钟之间收集的再生物中发现了最大的IPA含量,而在0和3分钟之间发现了最低的IPA含量。对于AC,还发现再生物中IPA的百分比随照射时间的增加而增加。 ud ud尝试对过程进行建模。第一步是使用智能重量分析仪(IGA)在298 K下获得纯吸附等温线。对于AC和Dow吸附剂,Toth和CIMF模型分别非常适合纯IPA和水等温线。混合物等温线用病毒方程式描述。涉及陶氏化学的混合物实验结果表明,该混合物具有理想的吸附性能。 AC显示出非常不理想的行为。结合了共吸附等温线的数学模型(在Matlab上编译)用于预测固定床吸附过程中的穿透时间。该模型能够相当准确地预测陶氏的突破性数据。 ud ud进行了经济分析,结果表明,出于安全考虑,AC是使用的两种吸附剂中较便宜的一种。 ud ud从印刷作品再生IPA已成功开发和测试。发现微波再生对于两种吸附剂都是有利的,因为在暴露于微波辐射之后没有发现吸附剂容量的损失。在比较两种吸附剂时,发现与水相比,陶氏比水捕获的IPA百分比更高。但是,就经济可行性而言,发现AC是更经济的吸附剂。

著录项

  • 作者

    Pereira Karendale B.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号