首页> 外文OA文献 >Safety of Cell Therapy with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (SafeCell): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials
【2h】

Safety of Cell Therapy with Mesenchymal Stromal Cells (SafeCell): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

机译:间充质基质细胞(SafeCell)细胞治疗的安全性:系统评价和Meta分析的临床试验。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs, “adult stem cells”) have been widely used experimentally in a variety of clinical contexts. There is interest in using these cells in critical illness, however, the safety profile of these cells is not well known. We thus conducted a systematic review of clinical trials that examined the use MSCs to evaluate their safety.Methods and Findings MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (to June 2011), were searched. Prospective clinical trials that used intravascular delivery of MSCs (intravenously or intra-arterially) in adult populations or mixed adult and pediatric populations were identified. Studies using differentiated MSCs or additional cell types were excluded. The primary outcome adverse events were grouped according to immediate events (acute infusional toxicity, fever), organ system complications, infection, and longer term adverse events (death, malignancy). 2347 citations were reviewed and 36 studies met inclusion criteria. A total of 1012 participants with clinical conditions of ischemic stroke, Crohn's disease, cardiomyopathy, myocardial infarction, graft versus host disease, and healthy volunteers were included. Eight studies were randomized control trials (RCTs) and enrolled 321 participants. Meta-analysis of the RCTs did not detect an association between acute infusional toxicity, organ system complications, infection, death or malignancy. There was a significant association between MSCs and transient fever.Conclusions Based on the current clinical trials, MSC therapy appears safe. However, further larger scale controlled clinical trials with rigorous reporting of adverse events are required to further define the safety profile of MSCs.
机译:背景间充质基质细胞(MSC,“成人干细胞”)已在各种临床环境中广泛用于实验。在危重病中使用这些细胞引起了人们的兴趣,但是,这些细胞的安全性并不为人所知。因此,我们对临床试验进行了系统的综述,以检查使用MSC的安全性。方法和结果检索MEDLINE,EMBASE和Cochrane对照试验中央注册簿(至2011年6月)。鉴定了前瞻性临床试验,该试验使用了成年人群或成年和小儿混合人群的血管内(静脉内或动脉内)递送MSCs。排除了使用分化的MSC或其他细胞类型的研究。主要预后不良事件根据即刻事件(急性输注毒性,发烧),器官系统并发症,感染和长期不良事件(死亡,恶性)分组。审查了2347篇文献,其中36篇研究符合纳入标准。共有1012名患有缺血性中风,克罗恩病,心肌病,心肌梗死,移植物抗宿主病的临床状况的参与者和健康志愿者。八项研究为随机对照试验(RCT),招募了321名参与者。对RCT的荟萃分析未发现急性输注毒性,器官系统并发症,感染,死亡或恶性肿瘤之间的关联。结论MSCs与短暂性发热之间存在显着相关性。结论根据目前的临床试验,MSC治疗似乎是安全的。但是,需要进一步进行严格报道不良事件的大规模对照临床试验,才能进一步确定MSC的安全性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号