首页> 外文OA文献 >Development and Preliminary Face and Content Validation of the “Which Health Approaches and Treatments Are You Using?” (WHAT) Questionnaires Assessing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Pediatric Rheumatology
【2h】

Development and Preliminary Face and Content Validation of the “Which Health Approaches and Treatments Are You Using?” (WHAT) Questionnaires Assessing Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use in Pediatric Rheumatology

机译:“您使用哪种健康方法和治疗方法”的开发和初步的面部和内容验证(WHAT)评估儿童风湿病补充和替代药物使用情况的问卷

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective\ud\udComplementary and alternative medicine (CAM) is commonly used by children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), yet no validated questionnaires assess that use. The objective of this study was to develop child self- and parent proxy-report questionnaires assessing CAM use and to determine the face and content validity of the “Which Health Approaches and Treatments are you using?” (WHAT) questionnaires in pediatric rheumatology.\ud\udMethods\ud\udA sequential phased mixed methods approach was used to develop the questionnaires. A Delphi Survey of 126 experts followed by an interdisciplinary consensus conference of 14 stakeholders in CAM, general pediatrics and pediatric rheumatology was held to develop consensus on the content of the questionnaires using a nominal group technique. To determine face and content validity of the questionnaires, two groups, including (a) a purposive sample of 22 children with JIA 8 to 18 years and their parents from the Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario and the Hospital for Sick Children, and (b) 21 Canadian pediatric rheumatology experts, participated in interviews. Participants were independently asked about the goal, understandability and comprehensiveness of the WHAT questionnaires, as well as the relevance of items.\ud\udResults\ud\udConsensus was reached on 17 items of the WHAT questionnaires. The domains found to be relevant were child’s CAM use, factors associated with CAM use, perceived impact of CAM use, and communication about CAM. A total of 15 items in the parent proxy-report questionnaire and 13 items in the child report questionnaire showed adequate content validity.\ud\udConclusions\ud\udConsensus was reached by experts on the content of a pediatric CAM questionnaire. Face and content validity testing and modifications made to the WHAT questionnaires have helped ensure adequate preliminary validity for use in pediatric rheumatology. This constitutes the basis for further testing of these questionnaires in pediatric rheumatology and for adaptation to other chronic diseases.
机译:目的\ ud \ ud补充和替代药物(CAM)是儿童特发性关节炎(JIA)的儿童常用的药物,但尚未通过有效的问卷调查评估使用这种药物。这项研究的目的是开发评估CAM使用情况的儿童自我和父母代理报告调查表,并确定“您正在使用哪种健康方法和治疗方法”的面部和内容有效性。小儿风湿病学(WHAT)问卷。\ ud \ udMethods \ ud \ ud采用顺序分阶段混合方法方法来开发问卷。举行了一次由126位专家组成的德尔菲调查,随后召开了由CAM,普通儿科和儿科风湿病学领域的14个利益相关者组成的跨学科共识会议,以使用名义组技术在调查表的内容上达成共​​识。为了确定问卷的面孔和内容有效性,分为两组,分别为(a)22名年龄在8至18岁之间的JIA儿童及其父母,分别来自东安大略儿童医院和病童医院,以及(b) 21名加拿大小儿风湿病专家参加了访谈。分别向参与者询问WHAT问卷的目标,可理解性和全面性以及项目的相关性。\ ud \ udResults \ ud \ ud对17份WHAT问卷达成了共识。被发现相关的领域包括儿童的CAM使用,与CAM使用相关的因素,对CAM使用的感知影响以及有关CAM的交流。父母代理报告调查表中的15项和儿童报告调查表中的13项显示出足够的内容效度。专家对儿科CAM问卷的内容达成共识。面部和内容有效性测试以及对WHAT问卷所做的修改有助于确保用于儿科风湿病学的足够的初步有效性。这构成了在儿科风湿病中进一步测试这些问卷以及适应其他慢性疾病的基础。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号