首页> 外文OA文献 >Cost Analysis Of Terminal Sterilization And Aseptic Processing Methods Of Sensitive Implantable Combination Drug Device Products
【2h】

Cost Analysis Of Terminal Sterilization And Aseptic Processing Methods Of Sensitive Implantable Combination Drug Device Products

机译:敏感的植入式组合药物装置产品最终灭菌和无菌处理方法的成本分析

摘要

Executive SummaryududCost Analysis of Terminal Sterilization and Aseptic Processing Methods of Sensitive Implantable Combination Drug Device Products ududCompany XududZenabu Bawa-Mamudu ??? 4/24/2015ududProfessional Science Master???s in Biotechnology, California State University San MarcosudududSterilization is the validated process and method of ensuring that a product after production and packaging is free of microorganisms. Sterility can be achieved through both terminal sterilization which ensures the Sterility Assurance Level of 10-6 level or Probability of Non-Sterile Unit of less than 10-6 and aseptic processing which ensures the equivalent of 10-3. The Sterility Assurance Levels (SAL) is the statistical probability of a microorganism surviving during the process (Mosely, 2008). udSterilization science continues to pursue the most effective means of sustaining this regulatory requirement. This is driven in large part by the evolution of sensitive combination products that cannot tolerate the harsh conditions of terminal sterilization. Division 1 and Division 2 are divisions of Company X, a biotechnology company that specializes in the manufacturing of implantable combination drug and medical devices for use in ophthalmic, cardiac, and vascular care and intervention. Trends in sterilization sciences directly impact Company X across all divisions. Observing these trends and influences enables the company to proactively adapt to changes that impact both existing as well as future products. udThe project investigated the cost of development, validation, and implementation of different sterilization models. The aim of the project was to also provide metrics to be applied as a measurement tool. The metric can be used in making knowledge based decisions on the most cost effective and time efficient sterilization modality for next generation of combination drug device products that meets Regulatory requirements for Sterility Assurance Level. The project closely examined the different terminal sterilization modalities adopted by Division 1 and Division 2, which includes Ethylene Oxide (EO) and Radiation (E-Beam) sterilization, as well as Aseptic processing methods for sensitive implantable combination drug and device. An analysis was performed using Company X combination drug and device products as models to represent the different sterilization modalities. A series of interviews and tours were completed to gather data, analyze, and compare the sterilization validation and production cost.udThe following sterilization cost evaluation metrics was developed, Production Sterilization Distribution Time, Sterilization Process Time, Sterilization Cost per Unit, Annual Sterilization Capacity, and Sterilization Method Revalidation Cost and an analysis was performed using these metric and measurements. The analysis showed significant differences between the three sterilization modalities. The overall results indicated that the E-beam Radiation sterilization method provided the lowest Production Sterilization Distribution Time, Sterilization Process Time, Sterilization Cost per Unit, Sterilization Method Revalidation Cost, and Labor Cost. E-beam Radiation also provided the highest Annual Sterilization Capacity when compared to Ethylene Oxide and Aseptic Processing methods. The approach and metrics developed in this project have application in investigation of cost effectiveness of other sterilization methods. udFurther research can use the developed metrics to evaluate sterilization methods for a range of Sterility Assurance Levels (SAL) that are deemed safe and on site sterilization models such as Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2) and Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2), that offer similar if not the same advantages as on site E-Beam.
机译:执行摘要 ud ud敏感植入式组合药物设备产品的最终灭菌和无菌处理方法的成本分析 ud udCompany X ud udZenabu Bawa-Mamudu ??? 4/24/2015 ud ud加利福尼亚州立大学圣马科斯分校生物技术专业科学硕士 ud ud ud消毒是经过验证的过程和方法,可确保生产和包装后的产品不含微生物。既可以通过确保10-6级的无菌保证水平或小于10-6的非无菌单位的概率的最终灭菌,也可以确保10-3的等效水平来进行无菌处理。无菌保证水平(SAL)是微生物在此过程中存活的统计概率(Mosely,2008)。 ud灭菌科学继续寻求最有效的方法来维持这一法规要求。这在很大程度上是由于敏感组合产品的发展所致,这些产品不能忍受最终灭菌的苛刻条件。 1区和2区是X公司的分支机构,X公司是一家生物技术公司,专门生产用于眼科,心脏和血管护理和干预的可植入组合药物和医疗设备。灭菌科学的发展趋势直接​​影响了所有部门的X公司。观察这些趋势和影响使公司能够主动适应影响现有和未来产品的变化。 ud该项目调查了不同灭菌模型的开发,验证和实施成本。该项目的目的还在于提供可用作度量工具的度量。该度量标准可用于在满足无菌保证级别法规要求的下一代组合药物设备产品的最具成本效益和时间效率的灭菌方式方面做出基于知识的决策。该项目仔细检查了部门1和部门2采用的不同最终灭菌方式,包括环氧乙烷(EO)和放射线(E-Beam)灭菌,以及用于敏感的可植入组合药物和设备的无菌处理方法。使用Company X组合药物和设备产品作为模型进行了分析,以代表不同的灭菌方式。完成了一系列的采访和访问,以收集数据,分析和比较灭菌验证和生产成本。 ud开发了以下灭菌成本评估指标:生产灭菌分配时间,灭菌过程时间,单位灭菌成本,年度灭菌能力,以及“灭菌方法重新验证费用”,并使用这些指标和度量进行了分析。分析显示三种灭菌方式之间存在显着差异。总体结果表明,电子束辐射灭菌方法提供了最低的生产灭菌分配时间,灭菌过程时间,单位灭菌成本,灭菌方法重新确认成本和人工成本。与环氧乙烷和无菌处理方法相比,电子束辐射还具有最高的年度灭菌能力。本项目中开发的方法和度量标准已应用于调查其他灭菌方法的成本效益。 ud进一步的研究可以使用已开发的度量标准来评估一系列被认为是安全的无菌保证水平(SAL)的灭菌方法,以及现场灭菌模型,例如过氧化氢(H2O2)和二氧化氮(NO2),这些方法可以提供相似的结果。具有与现场电子束相同的优势。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bawa-Mamudu Zenabu;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号