首页> 外文OA文献 >TYPES OF TEACHER QUESTIONS AND STUDENT RESPONSES IN EFL CLASSROOM ACTIVITIES :A Case Study of Questioning in SMP in Mataram
【2h】

TYPES OF TEACHER QUESTIONS AND STUDENT RESPONSES IN EFL CLASSROOM ACTIVITIES :A Case Study of Questioning in SMP in Mataram

机译:EFL课堂活动中教师问题的类型和学生的反应:以Mataram中的SMP提问为例

摘要

This study investigates the types of teacher questions, question modifications, student responses, and the ways how teacher questions facilitate EFL classroom learning. This study is conducted on the reasons that almost all classroom interactions during teaching learning process are built by questioning and it plays important roles to provide comprehensible inputs, to facilitate interaction, and to trigger students’ output. This study was guided by four research questions: 1) What types of question do the teachers usually use in EFL classroom? 2) What modification techniques do the teachers employ when the questions are not understood?, 3) What sorts of responses do the questions generate from the students?, and 4) How can teacher questions facilitate language learning?ududThis study is a qualitative case study in nature. The setting was an SMP in Mataram with two teachers and 65 students as the participants. The data were collected by non-participant observation with video recording and field notes. Analyzing data was carried out based on the field note and transcript of teacher-students’ conversation gathered by video recording.ududIt is found that the teachers use different kinds of questions in their classroom teachings. Teacher A used more referential questions, while Teacher B used more display questions. The other types of questions were also found to use such as clarification request, comprehension check, and confirmation check with less frequency. The teachers used repeating, rephrasing, decomposing, and giving additional questions to modify their questions. Student responses were categorized as verbal and non-verbal responses. The verbal responses were characterized as restricted and elaborative responses. Restricted responses were generated by display questions and elaborative responses were frequently generated by referential questions. The non-verbal responses were shown by nodding, shaking, smiling, laughing, acting, and hesitating.ududIt is concluded that the discrepancy of using types of questions is caused by the material and approach of teaching. The use of authentic material and classroom discussion technique facilitates the teacher to use referential questions. This leads the students to provide more elaborative responses, more interactions happened and more comprehensible inputs could be provided. For this regard, broader research with more participants and longer time is recommended to carry out for further study.
机译:这项研究调查了教师问题的类型,问题修改,学生的回答以及教师问题如何促进EFL课堂学习的方式。进行这项研究的原因是,在教学学习过程中几乎所有的课堂互动都是通过提问建立的,它在提供可理解的输入,促进互动和触发学生的输出中起着重要的作用。这项研究以四个研究问题为指导:1)教师在EFL课堂上通常使用哪种类型的问题? 2)在不理解问题的情况下,教师会采用哪些修改技巧?,3)从学生那里产生问题的答案是什么?,以及4)教师的问题如何促进语言学习? ud ud定性案例研究。设置是Mataram的SMP,有两名老师和65名学生参加。数据是通过无参与观察的视频记录和现场记录收集的。根据实地记录和通过视频记录收集的师生对话记录进行数据分析。 ud ud发现教师在课堂教学中使用不同类型的问题。老师A使用了更多参考性问题,而老师B使用了更多展示性问题。还发现其他类型的问题也可以使用,例如澄清请求,理解检查和确认检查的频率较低。教师使用重复,重述,分解和给出其他问题来修改他们的问题。学生的反应分为口头和非口头反应。言语反应的特征是限制性和详尽的反应。限制回答是由展示性问题产生的,而详尽的回答通常是由参照性问题引起的。点头,摇晃,微笑,大笑,行动和犹豫表示非语言回答。 ud ud得出结论:使用问题类型的差异是由教学的材料和方法引起的。使用真实的材料和课堂讨论技术可以帮助老师使用参考性问题。这导致学生提供更多详尽的答案,发生更多的互动,并提供更多可理解的输入。因此,建议进行更广泛的研究,使更多的参与者和更长的时间进行进一步的研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Akmaludin -;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号