首页> 外文OA文献 >Development of organic farming Europe – implications for Agenda 2000. Paper presented to Soil Association seminar, Organic Farming and Agenda 2000 CAP Reform, Highgrove, 18th February 1999
【2h】

Development of organic farming Europe – implications for Agenda 2000. Paper presented to Soil Association seminar, Organic Farming and Agenda 2000 CAP Reform, Highgrove, 18th February 1999

机译:欧洲有机农业的发展–对2000年议程的影响。论文提交给土壤协会研讨会,有机农业和2000年议程CAP改革,Highgrove,1999年2月18日

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Organic farming is increasingly recognised, by consumers, farmers, environmentalists and policy-makers, as one of a number of possible models for environmental, social and financial sustainability in agriculture. It has taken a long time to get this far. Organic farming’s roots can be traced back more than 100 years. Certified organic production dates back 25-30 years (70 years in the case of Demeter-certified bio-dynamic production).ududYet little more than one percent of agriculture in Europe is organic, and much less than that in other parts of the world. Many have argued that organic farming will never capture the hearts and minds of the majority of farmers, because it is too idealistic and restrictive. What is needed, they argue, is an intermediate approach, such as integrated crop management or an ill-specified ‘low-input’ or ‘sustainable’ agriculture that is not as ‘extreme’ as organic farming and is therefore more likely to be acceptable to the majority of farmers.ududPolicy-makers face a difficult choice. Should they encourage more organic farming, which, as research increasingly demonstrates, often offers more environmental and other benefits than the intermediate approaches, but is believed to be only a minority interest? Or should they encourage the intermediate approaches, which, although the environmental benefits are more limited, may be adopted by more farmers, with possibly greater overall impact?ududThis paper discuses the growth of organic farming in Europe, the potential and pre-conditions for widespread conversion, integraed action plans and the policy challenge for farmers.
机译:消费者,农民,环境保护主义者和政策制定者日益认识到有机农业是农业环境,社会和金融可持续性的多种可能模式之一。花了很长时间才能达到目标。有机耕作的根源可以追溯到100多年前。经过认证的有机生产可以追溯到25到30年(对于Demeter认证的生物动力生产,则是70年)。 ud ud但是,欧洲只有不到百分之一的农业是有机农业,远低于欧洲其他地区的有机农业。世界。许多人认为,有机农业永远不会吸引大多数农民的思想,因为它过于理想化和过于严格。他们认为,所需要的是一种中间方法,例如综合作物管理或不明确规定的“低投入”或“可持续”农业,而这种农业不像有机农业那样“极端”,因此更可能被接受。对大多数农民而言。 ud ud政策制定者面临着艰难的选择。他们是否应该鼓励更多的有机农业,正如研究日益表明的那样,与中间方法相比,有机农业通常会提供更多的环境和其他好处,但被认为只是少数利益?还是他们应该鼓励采取中间途径,尽管环境效益受到更多限制,但可能会被更多的农民采用,并可能产生更大的总体影响? ud ud本文探讨了欧洲有机农业的发展,潜力和广泛转化的条件,综合行动计划以及农民面临的政策挑战。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lampkin Nic;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1999
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号