首页> 外文OA文献 >Combined and relative effect levels of perceived risk, knowledge, optimism, pessimism, and social trust on anxiety among inhabitants concerning living on heavy metal contaminated soil
【2h】

Combined and relative effect levels of perceived risk, knowledge, optimism, pessimism, and social trust on anxiety among inhabitants concerning living on heavy metal contaminated soil

机译:居住在重金属污染土壤上的居民对焦虑的感知风险,知识,乐观,悲观和社会信任感的综合和相对影响水平

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This research aims at combined and relative effect levels on anxiety of: (1) perceived risk, knowledge, optimism, pessimism, and social trust; and (2) four sub-variables of social trust among inhabitants concerning living on heavy metal contaminated soil. On the basis of survey data from 499 Chinese respondents, results suggest that perceived risk, pessimism, optimism, and social trust have individual, significant, and direct effects on anxiety, while knowledge does not. Knowledge has significant, combined, and interactive effects on anxiety together with social trust and pessimism, respectively, but does not with perceived risk and optimism. Social trust, perceived risk, pessimism, knowledge, and optimism have significantly combined effects on anxiety; the five variables as a whole have stronger predictive values than each one individually. Anxiety is influenced firstly by social trust and secondly by perceived risk, pessimism, knowledge, and optimism. Each of four sub-variables of social trust has an individual, significant, and negative effect on anxiety. When introducing four sub-variables into one model, trust in social organizations and in the government have significantly combined effects on anxiety, while trust in experts and in friends and relatives do not; anxiety is influenced firstly by trust in social organization, and secondly by trust in the government.
机译:这项研究的目的是针对以下方面的焦虑的综合和相对影响水平:(1)感知的风险,知识,乐观,悲观和社会信任; (2)居民对生活在重金属污染土壤上的社会信任的四个子变量。根据来自499位中国受访者的调查数据,研究结果表明,感知到的风险,悲观主义,乐观主义和社会信任感对焦虑有个别,显着和直接的影响,而知识则没有。知识与社交信任和悲观情绪分别对焦虑有显着,综合和互动的影响,但对感知的风险和乐观则没有影响。社会信任,感知的风险,悲观,知识和乐观对焦虑有明显的综合影响。总体而言,这五个变量比每个变量具有更强的预测价值。焦虑首先受到社会信任的影响,其次受到感知的风险,悲观情绪,知识和乐观情绪的影响。社会信任的四个子变量中的每一个对焦虑都有单独的,显着的和负面的影响。将四个子变量引入一个模型时,对社会组织和政府的信任对焦虑的综合影响很大,而对专家以及对亲朋好友的信任则没有。焦虑首先受到对社会组织的信任的影响,其次受到对政府的信任的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号