首页> 外文OA文献 >Phenotypic and phylogenetic identification of coliform bacteria obtained from 12 USEPA approved coliform methods
【2h】

Phenotypic and phylogenetic identification of coliform bacteria obtained from 12 USEPA approved coliform methods

机译:从USEPA批准的12种大肠菌方法获得的大肠菌的表型和系统发育鉴定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The current definition of coliform bacteria is method-dependent, and when different culture-based methods are used, discrepancies in results can occur and affect the accuracy in identifying true coliforms. This study used an alternative approach to identify true coliforms by combing the phenotypic traits of the coliform isolates and the phylogenetic affiliation of 16S rRNA gene sequences together with the use of lacZ and uidA genes. A collection of 1404 isolates from 12 US Environmental Protection Agency approved coliform-testing methods were characterized based on their phylogenetic affiliations and responses to their original isolation medium and Lauryl Tryptose broth, m-Endo and MI agar media. Isolates were phylogenetically classified into 32 true coliform or targeted Enterobacteriaceae (TE) groups, and 14 non-coliform or non-targeted Enterbacteriaceae (NTE) groups. It was statistically shown that detecting true-positive (TP) events is more challenging than detecting true-negative (TN) events. Furthermore, most false-negative (FN) events were associated with four TE groups (i.e., Serratia group I, Providencia, Proteus, and Morganella), and most false-positive (FP) events with two NTE groups, Aeromonas and Plesiomonas. In Escherichia coli testing, 18 out of 145 E. coli isolates identified by those enzymatic methods were validated as FNs. The reasons behind the FP and FN reactions could be explained through the analysis of the lacZ and uidA gene. Overall, combining the analyses of 16S rRNA, lacZ and uidA genes with the growth responses of TE and NTE on culture-based media is an effective way to evaluate the performance of coliform detection methods.
机译:当前大肠菌的定义取决于方法,当使用不同的基于培养的方法时,结果可能会出现差异并影响鉴定真正大肠菌的准确性。这项研究通过结合大肠菌群的表型特征和16S rRNA基因序列的系统发育关系,并结合使用lacZ和uidA基因,使用了另一种鉴定大肠菌群的方法。收集了来自12种美国环境保护局批准的大肠菌检测方法的1404株分离菌,并根据它们的系统发生亲缘关系以及对原始分离培养基和月桂基胰蛋白酶肉汤,m-Endo和MI琼脂培养基的反应进行了表征。分离物在系统发育上分为32个真正的大肠菌或目标肠杆菌科(TE)组和14个非大肠菌或非目标肠杆菌科(NTE)组。统计上表明,检测真阳性(TP)事件比检测真阴性(TN)事件更具挑战性。此外,大多数假阴性(FN)事件与四个TE组(即Serratia I,Providencia,Proteus和Morganella)相关,而大多数假阳性(FP)事件与两个NTE组(气单胞菌和假单胞菌)相关。在大肠杆菌测试中,通过这些酶方法鉴定的145种大肠杆菌分离物中有18种被确认为FN。 FP和FN反应背后的原因可以通过对lacZ和uidA基因的分析来解释。总体而言,将16S rRNA,lacZ和uidA基因的分析与TE和NTE在基于培养基的培养基上的生长反应相结合,是评估大肠菌检测方法性能的有效方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号