首页> 外文OA文献 >Regulating corporate regulators through contract law? : the case of corporate social responsibility codes of conduct
【2h】

Regulating corporate regulators through contract law? : the case of corporate social responsibility codes of conduct

机译:通过合同法监管公司监管者? :企业社会责任行为守则

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Codes of conduct transcend the boundaries between the concepts of self-regulation, contract and regulation. This contribution focuses specifically on the phenomenon of corporate codes of conduct and argues that these codes can be described as a genuine form of regulation initiated by corporations, which as a consequence requires private law as the applicable legal framework to become more regulatory itself. In the context of this paper, corporate codes are defined as unilateral selfcommitments by companies to respect fundamental societal interests, such as human rights, labour standards or environmental protection, and the specific focus is on the role of contract law in regulating this corporate regulatory activity. To that end, the paper consists of four parts: it starts by proffering an explanation of why the phenomenon of corporate codes of conduct has only recently started to interest contract law scholars. It continues by analysing the way in which corporations use (and do not use) contracts and contract law enforcement in developing and practising their codes, and how contract law doctrine perceives this strategy. It reveals that there is currently a high degree of uncertainty over how contract law doctrine should react to this phenomenon. A normative argument is therefore developed and contextualised in favour of a stronger role for contract law in enforcing and regulating corporate codes. The paper concludes by emphasising the need for contract law to become regulatory in a novel sense: rather than focussing solely on the regulation of private actors via mandatory rules, contract law needs to be responsive to the conflict brought about by regulation through corporate codes of conduct by specifying clear rights and obligations that corporate regulators incur through adopting of a code of conduct.
机译:行为准则超越了自我监管,契约和监管概念之间的界限。该贡献特别关注公司行为准则的现象,并认为这些准则可以描述为公司发起的一种真正的监管形式,因此需要将私法作为适用的法律框架,以使其自身更具监管性。在本文的上下文中,公司守则被定义为公司尊重人权,劳工标准或环境保护等基本社会利益的单方面自我承诺,并且特别关注合同法在规范公司监管活动中的作用。 。为此,本文包括四个部分:首先,对为什么公司行为守则现象只是在最近才引起合同法学者的兴趣进行了解释。它通过分析公司在制定和实践其守则时使用(不使用)合同和合同执法的方式,以及合同法学说如何看待这一策略的方式继续进行。它表明,合同法学说应如何应对这种现象目前存在高度不确定性。因此,制定了规范性的论证并进行了语境化,以支持合同法在执行和规范公司法规中发挥更大的作用。本文最后强调强调合同法必须以新颖的方式进行监管:合同法不仅要专注于通过强制性规则对私人行为者进行监管,还需要对通过公司行为守则进行的监管所产生的冲突做出回应通过规定公司监管机构通过采用行为准则而产生的明确权利和义务。

著录项

  • 作者

    BECKERS Anna;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号