首页> 外文期刊>Corporate Governance >Multinational Corporation Codes of Conduct: Governance Tools for Corporate Social Responsibility?
【24h】

Multinational Corporation Codes of Conduct: Governance Tools for Corporate Social Responsibility?

机译:跨国公司行为准则:企业社会责任的治理工具?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Manuscript Type: Empirical Research Issue: We investigate the assumption found in code and corporate social responsibility (CSR) literature that suggests codes are primarily associated with the CSR practices of an organization. Research Findings/Results: A web-based study of 150 corporations from three different countries indicates there is little empirical support for this link between codes and CSR. Thus, if a corporation has a code, it is more likely used to govern traditional business concerns, such as compliance with third party governance requirements, internal issues such as conflict of interest, bribery and corruption, insider trading, etc. This is consistent across all three countries. Therefore we must be cautious against assuming a link between codes and CSR. Evidence of the different governance contexts is also briefly discussed. Theoretical Implications: Findings are addressed to theoretical debates about the construction of corporate identity, the amoralization of business, and the globalization of management practices. Practical Implications: Stakeholders must be careful in assuming that the presence of a code indicates CSR commitments or behavior. Stakeholders need to look at the content of the code to confirm or deny this assumption, particularly such stakeholders as investors who tend to use the existence of a code as evidence of CSR practices to tick "check the box."
机译:原稿类型:实证研究问题:我们调查准则和企业社会责任(CSR)文献中发现的假设,这些假设表明准则主要与组织的CSR实践相关。研究结果/结果:来自三个不同国家的150家公司的基于网络的研究表明,守则与CSR之间的这种联系几乎没有经验支持。因此,如果公司拥有代码,则它更有可能用于治理传统的业务问题,例如遵守第三方治理要求,内部问题(例如利益冲突,贿赂和腐败,内部交易等)。这三个国家。因此,我们必须谨慎地假设代码与CSR之间没有联系。还简要讨论了不同治理环境的证据。理论意义:研究结果针对有关公司标识构建,业务非道德化和管理实践全球化的理论辩论。实际含义:利益相关者必须谨慎地假设代码的存在表明CSR承诺或行为。利益相关者需要查看守则的内容以确认或否认这一假设,尤其是那些倾向于将守则的存在作为CSR实践证据的“投资人”之类的投资者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号