首页> 外文OA文献 >Estimation of Optimal Biomass Removal Rate Based on Tolerable Soil Erosion for Single-Pass Crop Grain and Biomass Harvesting System
【2h】

Estimation of Optimal Biomass Removal Rate Based on Tolerable Soil Erosion for Single-Pass Crop Grain and Biomass Harvesting System

机译:基于可耐受土壤侵蚀的单程作物籽粒和生物量收获系统的最佳生物量去除率估算

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

As the demand for biomass feedstocks grows, it is likely that agricultural residue will be removed in a way that compromises soil sustainability due to increased soil erosion, depletion of organic matter, and deterioration of soil physical characteristics. Since soil erosion from agricultural fields depends on several factors including soil type, field terrain, and cropping practices, the amount of biomass that can be removed while maintaining soil tilth varies substantially over space and time. The RUSLE2 soil erosion model, which takes into account these spatio-temporal variations, was used to estimate tolerable agricultural biomass removal rates at field scales for a single-pass crop grain and biomass harvesting system. Soil type, field topography, climate data, management practices, and conservation practices were stored in individual databases on a state or county basis. Geographic position of the field was used as a spatial key to access the databases to select site-specific information such as soil, topography, and management related parameters. These parameters along with actual grain yield were provided as inputs to the RUSLE2 model to calculate yearly soil loss per unit area of the field. An iterative technique was then used to determine site-specific tolerable biomass removal rates that keep the soil loss below the soil loss thresholds (T) of the field. The tolerable removal rates varied substantially with field terrain, crop management practices, and soil type. At a location in a field in Winnebago county, Iowa, with ~1% slope and conventional tillage practices, up to 98% of the 11 Mg ha-1 total above-ground biomass was available for collection with negligible soil loss. There was no biomass available to remove with conventional tillage practices on steep slopes, as in a field in Crawford county, Iowa, with a 12.6% slope. If no-till crop practices were adopted, up to 70% of the total above-ground biomass could be collected at the same location with 12.6% slope. In the case of a soybean-corn rotation with no-till practices, about 98% of total biomass was available for removal at the locations in the Winnebago field with low slopes, whereas 77% of total biomass was available at a location in the Crawford field with a 7.5% slope. Tolerable removal rates varied substantially over an agricultural field, which showed the importance of site-specific removal rate estimation. These removal rates can be useful in developing recommended rates for producers to use during a single-pass crop grain and biomass harvesting operation. However, this study only considered the soil erosion tolerance level in estimating biomass removal rates. Before providing the final recommendation to end users, further investigations will be necessary to study the potential effects of continuous biomass removal on organic matter content and other biophysical properties of the soil.
机译:随着对生物质原料需求的增长,由于土壤侵蚀增加,有机物耗竭和土壤物理特性恶化,可能会以损害土壤可持续性的方式去除农业残留物。由于农田的土壤侵蚀取决于多种因素,包括土壤类型,田间地形和耕作方式,因此在保持土壤倾角的同时可以清除的生物量随时间和空间变化很大。考虑了这些时空变化的RUSLE2土壤侵蚀模型被用于估算单道作物谷物和生物量收集系统在田间尺度上可容忍的农业生物量去除率。土壤类型,田间地形,气候数据,管理措施和保护措施均以州或县为单位存储在各个数据库中。字段的地理位置被用作空间键,以访问数据库以选择特定于地点的信息,例如土壤,地形和与管理相关的参数。这些参数以及实际的谷物产量被作为RUSLE2模型的输入,以计算田间单位面积的年土壤损失。然后使用一种迭代技术来确定特定位置的可忍受的生物量去除速率,该速率将土壤流失保持在田地的土壤流失阈值(T)以下。容许的去除率随田间地形,作物管理实践和土壤类型的不同而有很大差异。在爱荷华州Winnebago县一个田地的某个地方,坡度约为1%,采用常规耕作方法,可收集11 Mg ha-1地上总生物量中的98%,而土壤损失可忽略不计。在陡峭的山坡上没有传统耕作方式可清除的生物量,例如在爱荷华州克劳福德县的一块坡度为12.6%的田地中。如果采用免耕作法,则可以在同一地点以12.6%的坡度收集多达70%的地上生物量。在采用免耕作法的玉米玉米轮作的情况下,在Winnebago田地中低坡度的位置可去除总生物量的98%,而在Crawford的位置可去除总生物量的77%坡度为7.5%的油田。在一个农田上,容许的去除率差异很大,这表明估计特定地点的去除率非常重要。这些清除率对于制定推荐的使用率非常有用,供生产者在单程作物谷物和生物质收获操作期间使用。但是,本研究仅在估计生物量去除率时考虑了土壤侵蚀耐受水平。在向最终用户提供最终建议之前,有必要进行进一步的研究,以研究持续去除生物量对土壤有机质含量和其他生物物理特性的潜在影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号