首页> 外文OA文献 >Performance of commercial nonmethane hydrocarbon analyzers in monitoring oxygenated volatile organic compounds emitted from animal feeding operations
【2h】

Performance of commercial nonmethane hydrocarbon analyzers in monitoring oxygenated volatile organic compounds emitted from animal feeding operations

机译:商用非甲烷碳氢化合物分析仪在监测动物饲养操作产生的氧化性挥发性有机化合物方面的性能

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Quantifying non-methane hydrocarbons (NMHC) from animal feeding operations (AFOs) is challenging due to the broad spectrum of compounds and the polar nature of the most abundant compounds. The purpose of this study was to determine the performance of commercial NMHC analyzers for measuring volatile organic compounds (VOCs) commonly emitted from AFOs. Three different NMHC analyzers were tested for response to laboratory generated VOCs, and two were tested in the field at a commercial poultry facility. The NMHC analyzers tested included gas chromatography/flame ionization detector (GC/FID), photoacoustic infrared (PA-IR) and photoionization detector (PID). The GC/FID NHHC analyzer was linear in response to non-polar compounds, but detector response to polar oxygenated compounds were lower than expected due to poor peak shape on the column. The PA-IR NMHC instrument responded well to the calibration standard (propane), methanol, and acetone, but it performed poorly with larger alcohols and ketones and acetonitrile. The PA-IR response varied between compounds in similar compound classes. The PID responded poorly to many of the most abundant VOCs at AFOs, and it underreported alcohols byu3e70%. In the field monitoring study, total NMHC concentrations were calculated from sum total of VOC determined using EPA Methods TO-15 and TO-17 with GC-MS compared to results from NMHC analyzers. NMHC GC/FID values were greater than the values calculated from the individual compound measurements. This indicated the presence of small hydrocarbons not measured with TO-15 or TO-17 such as propane. The PA-IR response was variable, but it was always lower than the GC/FID response. Results suggest that improved approaches are needed to accurately determine the VOC profile and NMHC emission rates from AFOs.Implications:Commercial nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHC) analyzers that monitor volatile organic compounds (VOCs) will underreport true concentrations of VOCs if the compound profiles have significant levels of polar compounds. Laboratory experiments showed that the commercial instruments accurately measured nonpolar compounds, but polar compounds were being underreported by NMHC analyzers with known standards. Field experiments showed that laboratory instruments underreported true concentration in the field due to the fact that the most abundant NMHC associated with animal feeding operations were polar VOCs. This report recommends not using NMHC analyzers for quantifying VOCs at animal feeding operations.
机译:由于化合物种类繁多且最丰富的化合物具有极性,因此对动物饲养操作(AFO)中的非甲烷碳氢化合物(NMHC)进行定量分析具有挑战性。这项研究的目的是确定商用NMHC分析仪用于测量AFO通常排放的挥发性有机化合物(VOC)的性能。测试了三种不同的NMHC分析仪对实验室产生的VOC的响应,其中两种在商用家禽设施中进行了现场测试。测试的NMHC分析仪包括气相色谱/火焰电离检测器(GC / FID),光声红外(PA-IR)和光电离检测器(PID)。 GC / FID NHHC分析仪对非极性化合物的响应呈线性,但由于对色谱柱的不良峰形,检测器对极性氧化化合物的响应低于预期。 PA-IR NMHC仪器对校准标样(丙烷),甲醇和丙酮的响应良好,但在使用较大的醇,酮和乙腈的情况下效果较差。 PA-IR响应在类似化合物类别的化合物之间有所不同。 PID对AFO上许多最丰富的VOC的反应很差,并且少报了70%的酒精。在现场监测研究中,总NMHC浓度是根据EPA方法TO-15和TO-17和GC-MS测定的VOC总量与NMHC分析仪的结果进行比较得出的。 NMHC GC / FID值大于从各个化合物测量值计算得出的值。这表明存在未用TO-15或TO-17测量的小烃,例如丙烷。 PA-IR响应是可变的,但始终低于GC / FID响应。结果表明,需要改进方法来准确确定AFO的VOC分布图和NMHC排放率。极性化合物。实验室实验表明,商用仪器可以准确地测量非极性化合物,但是极性化合物被已知标准的NMHC分析仪所漏报。野外实验表明,由于与动物饲养有关的最丰富的NMHC是极性VOC,因此实验室仪器在野外的真实浓度报告不足。该报告建议不要在动物饲养操作中使用NMHC分析仪来量化VOC。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号