首页> 外文OA文献 >EFEKTIVITAS PEMBELAJARAN REMEDIAL MATEMATIKA UNTUK MENGATASI KESULITAN BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI POKOK PECAHAN DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KATINGAN
【2h】

EFEKTIVITAS PEMBELAJARAN REMEDIAL MATEMATIKA UNTUK MENGATASI KESULITAN BELAJAR SISWA PADA MATERI POKOK PECAHAN DITINJAU DARI KREATIVITAS SISWA SMP NEGERI DI KABUPATEN KATINGAN

机译:基于卡廷安州中学生的创造力材料,运用补救数学学习对克服学生的学习障碍的有效性

摘要

The background of this research is the low learning achievement inudMathematics of the students of state junior secondary schools in KatinganudRegency. To deal with the case, the learning alternative of the remedial learningudhas been done through the application of the discussion and task-assignmentudmethods on Fractions.udThe objective of the research is to investigate whether or not: (1) theudremedial learning of the discussion method results in a better learningudachievement in Mathematics than that of the task-assignment method; (2) theudstudents’ different creativities has given a different learning achievement inudMathematics; and (3) there is an interaction between the remedial learning ofuddiscussion method and that of task-assignment with high, medium, and lowudcreativity toward the learning achievement in Mathematics which one of bothudremedial learning methods gives better mathematic learning achievementuddiscussion to the students each with high, medium, and low creativity.udThis research is a quasi-experimental research with the population of allud7th-grade students in Katingan Regency. The sampling is conducted in use ofudstratified cluster random sampling technique from SMP Negeri 1 of CentraludKatingan and SMP Negeri 2 of Central Katingan. Furthermore, 2 classes fromudeach school are randomly taken and the students of Class VIIA of SMP Negeri 1udof Central Katingan and the students of Class VIIA of SMP Negeri 2 of CentraludKatingan as many as 72 students as Experiment Sample 1 while the students ofudClass VIIB of SMP Negeri 1 of Central Katingan and those of Class VIIB of SMPudNegeri 2 of Central Katingan as many as 65 students as Experiment Sample 2.udThe data-collecting technique for the sample of initial ability is in use of theudscores for Mathematics in the students’ report when they were in the 6th grade ofudprimary school of the even semester. As for the learning achievement inudMathematics, the achievement test is in use, while as for the learning creativityudlevel of the students, the learning creativity questionnaire in Mathematics is used.udBefore the experiment is conducted, the balance test is conducted by usingudthe t-average test to find out that Experiment Group 1 and Experiment Group 2udhave the same or balanced initial ability. The result of the balance test between theudstudents given the remedial approach of method discussion and that of task-udassignment is balanced. The hypothesis is in use of the two-way Analysis ofudVariances with unequal cells with the significance level of α = 0.05. The prerequisite test is conducted by using the Liliefors test for its normality test andudthe Barlett test for its homogeneity test. The result of the prerequisite test indicatesudthat the samples come from the population with normal distribution and from theudpopulation with homogeneous variances on the bases of the learning method andudthe creativity category.ududBased on the result of two-way Analysis of Variances with unequal cellsudwith the significance level of α = 0.05, this research concludes that on the 7thudgrade of junior secondary school in Katingan Regency in the Academic Year ofud2010/2011: (1) there is a difference in mathematics learning achievement betweenudthe students who get remedial learning approach with discussion and those whoudget remedial learning approach with assignment giving, which means that theudstudents get the learning in use of remedial learning approach with the method ofudassignment giving. The latter group of students obtains better mathematicsudlearning achievement than the previous group, (2) mathematics creative learningudis not significant on mathematics achievement learning. There is conclusion thatudthe student with high mathematics creative learning have equal with middle andudlow mathematics creative learning, and the student with middle mathematicsudcreative learning have equal student achievement with low mathematics creativeudlearning (3) there is no interaction between the learning creativity on the learningudachievement in mathematics on the main topic of fractions. The remedial learningudapproach with assignment giving, the students with the high, medium, and lowudlearning creativity have the same learning achievement. In the remedial learningudapproach with discussion, the student with the high creativity and those with theudmedium learning creativity and those with the low learning creativity, both theudstudents with the high learning creativity and those with the low learningudcreativity have the same learning achievement in the mathematics on the mainudtopic of fractions.ududKeywords: remedial learning, learning achievement, method of discussion,udmethod of assignment giving, mathematics learning creativity
机译:这项研究的背景是卡丁甘州公立初中生 ud数学学习成绩低下。为了解决这种情况,通过应用讨论和分数的任务分配 udmethod来进行补救性学习的学习替代方案。 ud研究的目的是研究是否:(1)讨论方法的无中介学习比任务分配方法有更好的数学学习/成就; (2)学生的创造力不同,数学学习成绩也有所不同。 (3)讨论方法的学习与高,中,低创造力的任务分配的学习对数学学习成绩之间存在交互作用,两种学习方法中的一种都能提供更好的数学学习成绩 uding对每个具有高,中,低创造力的学生的讨论。 ud这项研究是对Katingan Regency所有 ud7年级学生的数量进行的准实验研究。使用来自Central udKatingan的SMP Negeri 1和Central Katingan的SMP Negeri 2的未分层聚类随机抽样技术进行采样。此外,随机抽取来自 udeach学校的2个班级,中卡廷根SMP Negeri 1 udud的VIIA类学生和中 udKatingan SMP Negeri 2 SVIVI的学生作为实验样本1多达72名学生。中卡廷根SMP Negeri 1的 ud类VIIB的学生和中卡廷根SMP udNegeri 2的VIIB的学生多达实验样本2的65名学生。 ud正在使用初始能力样本的数据收集技术当他们在同一学期的 ud小学六年级时,学生报告中的 uds数学分数。至于 ud数学中的学习成就,则使用成就测验,而对于学生的学习创造力 udlevel,则使用数学中的学习创造力调查表。 ud在进行实验之前,先进行平衡测试。使用t平均值检验找出实验组1和实验组2具有相同或平衡的初始能力。在采用方法讨论的补救方法的学生之间的平衡测试结果与在任务分配的方法之间的平衡测试结果是平衡的。该假设用于具有不相等细胞且具有显着性水平α= 0.05的 udVarices的双向分析。先决条件测试通过使用Liliefors测试进行正态性测试,并使用Barlett测试进行同质性测试。前提测试的结果表明, ud样本来自具有正态分布的人口,并且基于学习方法和创造力类别而来自具有均匀方差的人口。 ud ud基于双向结果分析具有不相等细胞的方差具有显着性水平α= 0.05的情况,该研究得出的结论是,在 ud2010 / 2011学年的Katingan Regency初中7年级 udgrade中:(1)存在差异。在通过讨论获得辅导学习方法的学生与通过分配任务给予辅导学习方法的学生之间的数学学习成果,这意味着,学生通过分配任务的辅导学习方法获得学习的乐趣。后一组学生比前一组学生获得更好的数学/学习成绩,(2)数学创造力学习/对数学成绩学习不重要。结论是:数学学习能力较高的学生与中,低端数学创造力学习相等,而中数学创造力学习的学生与低数学创造力学习能力相同的学生成绩(3)之间没有交互作用在分数的主要主题上的数学学习/成就方面的学习创造力。有任务分配的辅导学习/学习方法,具有高,中,低学习理解力的学生具有相同的学习成绩。在讨论式的学习/学习方法中,具有较高创造力的学生,具有中等学习创造力的学生和具有较低学习能力的学生,具有较高学习创造力的学生和具有较低学习/创造力的学生都具有分数的主要 udtopic在数学上具有相同的学习成绩。 ud ud关键字:补救性学习,学习成绩,讨论方法,分配任务的ud方法,数学学习创造力

著录项

  • 作者

    Ria;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"id","name":"Indonesian","id":20}
  • 中图分类
  • 入库时间 2022-08-31 14:48:11

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号