首页> 外文OA文献 >IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ ABILTY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVEudTEXTS THROUGH COLLABORATIVE WRITING TECHNIQUEud(A Classroom Action Research at Grade VIII A Students of SMP Negeri 1udPelaihari, Tanah Laut Regency, South Kalimantan Province inudthe Academic Year of 2010/2011)ud
【2h】

IMPROVING THE STUDENTS’ ABILTY IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVEudTEXTS THROUGH COLLABORATIVE WRITING TECHNIQUEud(A Classroom Action Research at Grade VIII A Students of SMP Negeri 1udPelaihari, Tanah Laut Regency, South Kalimantan Province inudthe Academic Year of 2010/2011)ud

机译:在撰写说明文字时提高学生的能力 ud通过协作写作技术撰写的文字 ud(SMP Negeri 1 ud八年级A级学生的课堂行动研究南加里曼丹省丹那劳特摄政市Pelaihari2010/2011学年) ud

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Supiani. 2011. S. 890809027. Improving the Students’ Ability in WritingudDescriptive Texts through Collaborative Writing Technique (A Classroom ActionudResearch at Grade VIII A Students of SMP Negeri 1 Pelaihari, Tanah LautudRegency, South Kalimantan Province in the Academic Year of 2010/2011).udThesis: English Education of Graduate Program. Sebelas Maret University,udSurakarta. Consultants: (I) Dr. Abdul Asib, M.Pd, (II) Dr. Ngadiso, M.Pd.ududThe main objectives of the research are (1) to improve the ability inudwriting descriptive texts of the grade VIII A students of SMPN 1 Pelaihariudthrough collaborative writing technique; and (2) to know the strengths andudweaknesses of the implementation of collaborative writing technique in improvingudstudents’ writing ability of descriptive texts in the grade VIII A students of SMPNud1 Pelaihari.udThe classroom action research was employed in this research. The subjectudof the research is 28 of grade VIII A students of the SMP Negeri 1 Pelaihari in theudAcademic Year of 2010/2011. This action research was conducted in two cycles.udEach consisted of planning, implementing, observing, and reflecting the action. Inudcollecting the data, the researcher used quantitative and qualitative data. Theudquantitative data were taken from the writing tests scored by two scorers. Theudwriting test was scored based on content, organization, vocabulary, grammar, andudmechanics. The quantitative analysis that was used to analyze the students’udachievement before and after the cycle was implemented by using descriptiveudstatistics, finding out the mean of the scores in the test and the improvement of theudscores. Meanwhile, the qualitative data were taken from the questionnaire,udinterview, and observation which were done before and after the treatment. Thoseudwere analyzed by using Constant Comparative Method proposed by Strauss andudGlasser consisting of the following steps: (1) comparing incidents applicable toudeach category; (2) integrating categories and their properties; (3) delimiting theudtheory; and (4) writing the theory.udThe research findings are described in line with the problem statements asudfollows: first, by using collaborative writing technique the students’ ability inudwriting descriptive texts improves. This is proved by the significant increase ofudthe mean score of the post-test cycle 1 and post-test cycle 2. Besides, they can alsoudfollow the writing process well which covers six steps in their activities namelyudidea generating/pre-writing, drafting, reading, editing, copying, and evaluating.udThose steps help the students to produce their writing to be better. Second byudimplementing collaborative writing technique in teaching writing, the students’udbehavior in learning writing changes and improves their motivation as well.udMoreover, they are actively involved in pair work and the class situation becomesudlively and also increases the students’ participation in writing class. In theudteaching and learning process the students have interest and self-awareness inudwriting.udThird, based on the results of the research there are the strengths andudweaknesses. The strengths are: (1) CWT can improve the students’ writing ability because they do in pair with his/her partner and every step of writing helps themudto write better; (2) the students have become more motivated to study English; (3)udthe students have higher self-confidence and felt happy because the students wereudalso actively involved in working in a pair; and (4) it builds the teacher or theudcollaborator’s awareness that there are many varied ways which can be used inudteaching learning English. Besides, the weaknesses are: (1) the students have toudspend a long time to complete every step of writing process in the classroom; (2)udthe condition of the class is noisy; and (3) sometimes the pair has differentudopinions or arguments in developing paragraphs so it can make a difficult workingudsituation or poor finished product.udBased on the results of the research, it can be concluded that the use of theudcollaborative writing technique improves the students’ writing ability. Therefore,udit is recommended that teachers apply collaborative writing technique in teachingudwriting.udKeyword: Collaborative writing technique, descriptive texts, writing abilityudud
机译:Supiani。 2011. S. 890809027.通过协作写作技术提高学生的书面文字描述能力(一项课堂行动 udResearch在八年级SMP Negeri的学生1 Tanali Laut udRegency,南加里曼丹省,该学年2010/2011)。 ud论文:研究生英语教育。 Sebelas Maret University, ud苏拉卡尔塔。顾问:(I)阿卜杜勒·阿西布(Abdul Asib)博士,(II)恩加迪索(Ngadiso)博士, ud ud研究的主要目标是(1)提高对该年级描述性文字的覆盖能力VIII通过合作写作技巧,学习SMPN 1 Pelaihari ud的学生; (2)了解实施协作写作技术在提高八年级学生SMPN ud1 Pelaihari的描述性文字的学生写作能力方面的优势和不足。 ud本研究采用了课堂行动研究。研究的对象是2010/2011学年SMP Negeri 1 Pelaihari的VIII A年级学生中的28名。此行动研究分两个周期进行。 ud每个阶段都包括计划,实施,观察和反映行动。在收集数据时,研究人员使用了定量和定性数据。 量化数据取自两个记分员的笔试成绩。 udming测试是根据内容,组织,词汇,语法和 udmechanics进行评分的。通过使用描述性 udstatistics进行定量分析,以分析学生在本周期之前的学习成绩,找出测试中分数的平均值并提高 udscore。同时,从治疗前后的问卷,访谈,观察中获取定性数据。通过使用Strauss和 udGlasser提出的“常量比较方法”来分析这些事件,包括以下步骤:(1)比较适用于 udeach类的事件; (2)整合类别及其属性; (3)划定理论。 (ud)遵循问题陈述对研究结果进行了描述 udollows:首先,通过使用协作写作技术,学生在描述性文字中的写作能力得到了提高。测试后第1周期和测试后第2周期的平均得分显着提高,证明了这一点。此外,他们还可以按照写作过程的要求,很好地涵盖了写作过程中的六个步骤,即,udidea生成/ pre -ud,草稿,阅读,编辑,复制和评估。 ud这些步骤可帮助学生提高自己的写作水平。其次,通过在教学写作中运用协作写作技术,学生的学习写作行为也发生了变化,并提高了他们的动机。 ud此外,他们积极地参与配对工作,课堂状况变得活泼,也增加了学生的写作能力。参加写作课。在学习和学习过程中,学生对写作有兴趣和自我意识。第三,根据研究结果,他们具有长处和不足。优点是:(1)CWT可以提高学生的写作能力,因为他们与搭档一起学习,写作的每个步骤都有助于他们 udud更好地写作; (2)学生变得更有学习英语的动力; (3)因为学生积极参与配对工作,所以他们具有较高的自信心和幸福感; (4)建立教师或“协作者”的意识,即可以采用多种方法来学习英语。此外,缺点是:(1)学生不得不花很长时间才能完成课堂上写作的每个步骤; (2)该类情况嘈杂; (3)有时在开发段落时,这对货币对具有不同的 udopinions或论据,因此它可能会导致工作 udisitution或劣质的成品。 ud根据研究结果,可以得出结论,使用 udcollaborative写作技巧提高了学生的写作能力。因此, udit建议教师在教学 udwriting中使用协作写作技术。 ud关键字:协作写作技术,描述性文本,写作能力 ud ud

著录项

  • 作者

    SUPIANI;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"id","name":"Indonesian","id":20}
  • 中图分类

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号