首页> 外文OA文献 >EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THREE STEPS INTERVIEW (TSI) DAN TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN KLATEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016
【2h】

EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THREE STEPS INTERVIEW (TSI) DAN TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN KLATEN TAHUN PELAJARAN 2015/2016

机译:从克拉拉兰VIII类国家学生的数学逻辑智能审视功能材料的合作学习模型的三步访谈式(TSI)和思维对分(TPS)类型的实验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the learning models TSI, TPS, and direct learning model on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the students logical mathematical intelligence. The type of this study was quasi experimental study with 3 × 3 factorial design. The population were the eighth-grade students of junior high schools in Klaten Regency in the academic year of 2015/2016. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and logical mathematical intelligence test. The data analysis technique used was the two -way ANAVA with unbalanced cell. Based on the hypothesis, it was concluded as follows. 1) The mathematics learning achievement of TSI was better than TPS and direct learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of TPS was better than direct learning model. 2) The mathematics learning achievement of the students with high logical mathematics was better than the students with average and low logical mathematics, the students with average logical mathematics was better than the students with low logical mathematics. 3) The students with high logical mathematics who were treated by TSI, TPS, direct learning models had the same mathematics learning achievement, students with low logical mathematics treated with TPS and TSI has the same result for both models and was better direct learning model, the students who were treated by TPS learning model was better than direct learning model, the students with low logical mathematics who were treated by TSI was same as TPS and was better than direct learning model. 4) In TSI learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of students with high logical mathematic was better than the students with both average and low logical mathematics, the students with average logical mathematic was better than students with low logical mathematics, in TPS learning model, the students with high logical mathematics was same as the achievement of students with average logical mathematics and was better than the students with low logical mathematic, in direct learning model, the students with high logical mathematics was better than the students with average and low logical mathematics, the students with average logical mathematic s was same as the students with low logical mathematics.
机译:摘要:本研究的目的是确定从学生逻辑数学智能的角度来看,学习模型TSI,TPS和直接学习模型对数学学习成绩的影响。这项研究的类型是采用3×3析因设计的准实验研究。人口是2015/2016学年Klaten Regency初中的八年级学生。用于数据收集的工具是数学成绩测试和逻辑数学智能测试。所使用的数据分析技术是具有不平衡单元的双向ANAVA。基于该假设,得出以下结论。 1)TSI的数学学习成绩优于TPS和直接学习模型,TPS的数学学习成绩优于直接学习模型。 2)逻辑数学高的学生的数学学习成绩优于逻辑数学平均和低的学生,逻辑数学平均的学生优于逻辑数学低的学生。 3)使用TSI,TPS,直接学习模型处理的逻辑数学高的学生具有相同的数学学习成绩,使用TPS和TSI处理的低逻辑数学的学生对于这两种模型均具有相同的结果,并且是更好的直接学习模型,接受TPS学习模型的学生要比直接学习模型好,接受过TSI培训的逻辑数学低的学生与TPS一样,也要好于直接学习模型。 4)在TSI学习模式中,逻辑高的学生的数学学习成绩要好于逻辑和低逻辑的学生,平均逻辑的学生要好于逻辑数学低的学生,逻辑数学高的学生与平均逻辑数学的学生的成绩相同,并且优于逻辑低数学的学生,在直接学习模型中,逻辑数学高的学生比逻辑逻辑低的学生好,平均逻辑数学的学生与低逻辑数学的学生相同。

著录项

  • 作者

    RAHAYU HENI SEPTI;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号