首页> 外文OA文献 >Disability Discrimination in Long-Term Care: Using the Fair Housing Act to Prevent Illegal Screening in Admissions to Nursing Homes and Assisted Living Facilities
【2h】

Disability Discrimination in Long-Term Care: Using the Fair Housing Act to Prevent Illegal Screening in Admissions to Nursing Homes and Assisted Living Facilities

机译:长期护理中的残疾歧视:使用《公平住房法》防止对入院和辅助生活设施的入院者进行非法筛查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Nursing homes and assisted living facilities routinely require applicants to disclose an extensive amount of medical information. Not infrequently, these long-term care facilities use the information to deny admission to those applicants with relatively greater care needs. These denials constitute illegal discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Rehabilitation Act, but generally consumers are unaware of these protections or find litigation too expensive and time-consuming under their generally difficult circumstances.These illegal denials of service could be limited by active enforcement of the Fair Housing Act’s no-inquiry regulation, which prohibits a housing provider from inquiring into an applicant’s medical condition. If facilities in the first place had only limited access to information about an applicant’s medical conditions, the facilities would not have the means to illegally discriminate, and applicants would be protected without need of litigation.To this point, the no-inquiry regulation has not been utilized against long-term care facilities, due to a general but superficial belief that the no-inquiry regulation is incompatible with long-term care. This Article offers the first analysis of how the no-inquiry regulation could be employed in a long-term care setting.Courts consistently have ruled that long-term care facilities are “dwellings” and thus subject to the Fair Housing Act (FHA). The question at hand is if and how the FHA’s no-inquiry regulation can be applied in a long-term care setting. The Article examines the no-inquiry regulation’s exceptions and determines that none applies to a long-term care admission. A handicap (the term used by the FHA) is not required for admission, and applicants with handicaps are not necessarily given priority. Thus, enforcement of the no-inquiry regulation would prohibit long-term care facilities from obtaining any medical information from applicants.If enforcement of the no-inquiry regulation were to become reality, a long-term care facility in response likely would establish priority in admission for any applicant who needs the facility’s services and whose care needs do not exceed the facility’s capabilities. Establishing such a priority would allow a facility to obtain medical information from applicants, but that information would be limited to the information necessary to determine if the applicant were entitled to priority.Thus, contrary to the conventional wisdom, the no-inquiry regulation would be workable in a long-term care setting and furthermore would benefit applicants. Facilities would establish appropriate admission priorities and would have access only to the medical information relevant to those priorities. Illegal discrimination based on medical condition would lessen because facilities would not have access to the irrelevant medical information that otherwise might prompt such discrimination.
机译:疗养院和辅助生活设施通常要求申请人公开大量的医疗信息。这些长期照护机构并非经常使用该信息来拒绝那些具有相对更大照护需求的申请人。根据《美国残障人士法案》和《康复法案》,这些拒绝服务构成非法歧视,但是一般而言,消费者不了解这些保护措施,或者在一般困难的情况下发现诉讼过于昂贵和耗时。这些非法服务拒绝可以通过积极执法来限制根据《公平住房法》(Fair Housing Act)的免查询法规,该法规禁止住房提供商查询申请人的医疗状况。如果最初的机构仅能有限地获取有关申请人医疗状况的信息,那么这些机构将没有手段进行非法歧视,并且无需诉讼即可保护申请人的权益。由于普遍但肤浅的看法认为,无询问的法规与长期护理不兼容,因此被用于长期护理设施。本文首先分析了如何在长期照护环境中采用无询问条例。法院一贯认为,长期照护设施是“住所”,因此受《公平住房法》(FHA)的约束。当前的问题是,是否以及如何将FHA的无询问条例应用于长期护理环境。该条款检查了免查询条例的例外情况,并确定所有例外均不适用于长期护理。入学不需要残障(FHA使用的术语),有残障的申请人并不一定获得优先权。因此,强制执行无询问条例将禁止长期照护机构从申请人那里获得任何医疗信息。如果强制实行强制询问法,则长期照护机构可能会优先考虑任何需要设施服务且照料需求不超过设施能力的申请人的入院申请。确定这样的优先权将使机构能够从申请人那里获得医疗信息,但是该信息将仅限于确定申请人是否有权享有优先权的必要信息。因此,与传统观点相反,无查询条例将是可在长期护理环境中使用,并且还将使申请人受益。机构将确定适当的入院优先级,并且只能访问与那些优先级相关的医学信息。基于医疗条件的非法歧视将减少,因为设施将无法访问不相关的医疗信息,否则可能会导致这种歧视。

著录项

  • 作者

    Carlson Eric M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2006
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号