首页> 外文OA文献 >Deregulating Telecommunications in Internet Time
【2h】

Deregulating Telecommunications in Internet Time

机译:在互联网时代放松电信管制

摘要

The Telecommunications Act of 1996 has yielded more litigation and less local competition than its supporters expected or intended. Calls for its reform are multiplying. The article diagnoses the 1996 Actu27s failings and prescribes a framework for reform. The successful deregulations of the transportation industries and of long-distance telecommunications (precedents the 1996 Act sought to follow) demonstrate that the Act should have taken additional steps to promote intermodal telecommunications competition. Transportation deregulation successfully prompted competition where (as in the case of airlines and trucking) multiple firms could compete on an intramodal basis or where (as in the case of railroads) the single firm was subject to intermodal competition from firms using other technologies. The 1996 Actu27s reliance on the unbundling of incumbent local telephone companiesu27 networks reveals that its supporters thought that portions of the local wireline networks would remain bottlenecks. The lesson, therefore, is that the 1996 Act should have taken additional steps to create the conditions for intermodal competition. Based on this analysis, the article outlines a new communications law that increases the possibilities for intermodal competition. Indeed, the glimmers of hope for local competition - cell phone substitution and voice-over-Internet-protocol (VoIP) telephony - are intermodal competitors. Although the 1996 Act did move in this direction and the Federal Communications Commission is vigorous on several fronts, more can be done. Spectrum reform (the most significant missed opportunity in the 1996 Act) and other steps would decrease legal and economic barriers to intermodal competition. The article also addresses local and state control of telecommunications carriers, regulatory parity, universal service reform, and government funding of research and infrastructure, and it offers a technology-neutral regulatory scheme for VoIP. The proposed deregulatory agenda seeks a law capable of accommodating the speed and diversity of technological change in this u22Internet time.u22
机译:1996年的《电信法》比其支持者所预期或计划的产生了更多的诉讼,并减少了本地竞争。改革的呼声越来越高。这篇文章诊断了1996年法令的失败,并规定了改革的框架。对交通运输业和长途电信的成功放松管制(1996年法案的前身)是该法案应采取的进一步措施,以促进多式联运电信竞争。运输放松管制成功地促进了竞争,在该竞争中(如航空公司和卡车),多个公司可以在内部联运的基础上竞争,或者在一个公司(如铁路)在单个公司受到使用其他技术的公司的联运竞争的情况。 1996年的法案依赖于现有的本地电话公司网络的解除捆绑,这表明其支持者认为部分本地有线网络仍然会成为瓶颈。因此,可以得出的教训是,《 1996年文本》应该采取更多步骤,为多式联运竞争创造条件。在此分析的基础上,本文概述了一种新的通信法,该法增加了多式联运竞争的可能性。确实,对本地竞争的希望之光-手机替代和互联网协议语音(VoIP)电话-是多式联运的竞争对手。尽管1996年的法案确实朝着这个方向发展,而联邦通信委员会在几个方面都非常有朝气,但还有更多工作要做。频谱改革(1996年法令中最重大的错失机会)和其他步骤将减少多式联运竞争的法律和经济障碍。本文还讨论了电信运营商的本地和州控制,监管对等,通用服务改革以及政府对研究和基础设施的资助,并为VoIP提供了一种技术中立的监管方案。拟议中的放松管制议程旨在寻求一条能够适应互联网时代技术变革的速度和多样性的法律。

著录项

  • 作者

    Speta James B.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号