首页> 外文OA文献 >Freeing Racial Harassment from the Sexual Harassment Model
【2h】

Freeing Racial Harassment from the Sexual Harassment Model

机译:将性骚扰从性骚扰模型中解放出来

摘要

Judges, academics, and lawyers alike base their legal analyses of workplace racial harassment on the sexual harassment model. Legal principles derived from sexual harassment jurisprudence are presumed to be equally appropriate for racial harassment cases. The implicit assumption is that the social harms and public policy goals of racial harassment and sexual harassment are sufficiently similar to justify analogous scrutiny and remedies. Parties to racial harassment cases cite the reasoning and elements of sexual harassment cases without hesitation, as if racial harassment and sexual harassment are behaviorally and legally indistinguishable.This Article, however, questions the assumption that there should be a monolithic model for discriminatory workplace harassment. In particular, it questions whether the currently dominant sexual harassment model should be used automatically as the paradigm in racial harassment disputes. Part I begins by acknowledging and explaining why the legal community analogizes racial harassment claims and jurisprudence to sexual harassment claims and jurisprudence. Part II posits that this analogy is problematic given the fundamental differences between racial harassment and sexual harassment. While empirical evidence of these differences is currently limited, Part II identifies and discusses two pioneering examples. The first documents important dissimilarities between racial harassment litigation and sexual harassment litigation; the second chronicles the differences between the dynamics and theoretical explanations for racial harassment and sexual harassment in the law firm context.Given the dominance of the sexual harassment model and the presumption of its applicability to other harassment disputes, including racial harassment, it is not surprising that comparatively little research and study of racial harassment and other forms of harassment have been done. The discussion and analysis here contributes to the research on the topic. Finally, Part III explores the implications of freeing racial harassment from the sexual harassment model.
机译:法官,学者和律师都基于性骚扰模型对工作场所种族骚扰进行法律分析。假定从性骚扰判例中得出的法律原则同样适用于种族骚扰案件。隐含的假设是,种族骚扰和性骚扰的社会危害和公共政策目标足够相似,足以证明进行类似的审查和补救。种族骚扰案件的当事方毫不犹豫地引用了性骚扰案件的理由和要素,就好像种族骚扰和性骚扰在行为和法律上是无法区分的一样。特别是,它质疑是否应自动使用当前占主导地位的性骚扰模型作为种族骚扰纠纷的范例。第一部分首先承认并解释了法律界为什么将种族骚扰索赔和判例法比作性骚扰索赔和判例法。第二部分认为,鉴于种族骚扰和性骚扰之间的根本区别,这种类比是有问题的。尽管目前对这些差异的经验证据有限,但第二部分指出并讨论了两个开创性的例子。第一份文件记录了种族骚扰诉讼与性骚扰诉讼之间的重大差异;第二部分记载了律师事务所背景下种族骚扰和性骚扰的动力学解释和理论解释之间的差异。鉴于性骚扰模型的主导地位以及假定其适用于包括种族骚扰在内的其他骚扰纠纷,这不足为奇关于种族骚扰和其他形式骚扰的研究和研究相对较少。这里的讨论和分析有助于对该主题的研究。最后,第三部分探讨了将性骚扰从性骚扰模型中解放出来的含义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Chew Pat K.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号