首页> 外文OA文献 >Preservation of community structure in modern reef coral life and death assemblages of the Florida Keys: Implications for the Quaternary fossil record of coral reefs
【2h】

Preservation of community structure in modern reef coral life and death assemblages of the Florida Keys: Implications for the Quaternary fossil record of coral reefs

机译:在佛罗里达礁礁的现代礁珊瑚生死组合中保存社区结构:对珊瑚礁第四纪化石记录的启示

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The reef fossil record is the exclusive database from which analyses of the response of coral communities to environmental change over geological time scales may be gauged. However, few studies have attempted to ascertain whether the reef fossil record is a reasonably accurate representation of a once living coral community. To address this issue, we first assume that an assemblage of dead corals accumulating in close proximity to a living coral reef(including the dead portions of living colonies) provides a reasonable proxy for the material that potentially becomes fossilized We then perform a systematic comparison of the taxonomic composition and diversity present in coral life assemblages and death assemblages accumulating in reef tract and patch reef environments adjacent to Key Large, Florida. The death assemblage is distinct from the life assemblage, but matches exactly the zonation of live corals between reef tract and patch reef environments. The difference in taxonomic composition between life and death assemblages is the result of a striking growth form bias in the depth assemblage: massive coral colony forms predominate in the life assemblages in both environments, whereas branching colony forms predominate in the death assemblages. Calculations of species richness and the Shannon-Wiener index of diversity produced conflicting results. At one reef tract site, the death assemblage was more diverse than the life assemblage. Unlike the Indo-Pacific, the subset of the life assemblage retained as recognizable corals in the death assemblage is not less diverse. We attribute this difference to a more diverse "starting pool" of live corals in the Indo-Pacific. Fidelity indices were similar to those calculated for life and death assemblages occurring in the Indo-Pacific, but very different than those compiled for molluscan shelly assemblages. If the death assemblages we examined represent a reasonable proxy for a potential fossil assemblage, analyses of relative changes in coral reef community structure during Quaternary time should provide reliable base line data for assessing the response of modern Caribbean reefs to global change.
机译:礁石化石记录是唯一的数据库,可以从中评估对珊瑚群落对地质时间尺度内环境变化的响应的分析。但是,很少有研究试图确定珊瑚化石记录是否可以合理地准确地代表曾经生活过的珊瑚群落。为了解决这个问题,我们首先假设一群死珊瑚聚集在一个活珊瑚礁附近(包括活菌落的死部分),为可能被化石的物质提供了一个合理的替代。然后,我们对在佛罗里达州Key Large附近的珊瑚礁和斑块环境中积累的珊瑚生物和死亡生物中存在的生物分类组成和多样性。死亡组合与生命组合不同,但与礁区和斑块礁环境之间的活珊瑚分区完全匹配。生命组合和死亡组合之间的生物分类组成上的差异是深度组合中引人注目的生长形式偏差的结果:在两种环境中,大型珊瑚群落形式在生命组合中占主导地位,而分支组合形式在死亡组合中占主导地位。物种丰富度的计算和香农-维纳多样性指数产生了矛盾的结果。在一个珊瑚礁站点,死亡组合比生命组合更多样化。与印度太平洋不同,在死亡组合中保留为可识别的珊瑚的生命组合的子集也同样多样化。我们将此差异归因于印度太平洋中不同种类的活珊瑚“起始池”。保真度指数类似于印度-太平洋发生的生死组合所计算的那些,但与软体动物壳状组合所汇编的那些相差很大。如果我们研究的死亡组合可以合理地代表潜在的化石组合,那么对第四纪珊瑚礁群落结构相对变化的分析应为评估现代加勒比礁对全球变化的响应提供可靠的基线数据。

著录项

  • 作者

    Greenstein BJ; Pandolfi JM;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1997
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号