首页> 外文OA文献 >Wind-Induced Torsional Loads on Low- and Medium-Rise Buildings
【2h】

Wind-Induced Torsional Loads on Low- and Medium-Rise Buildings

机译:中低层建筑的风致扭转载荷

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Proper building design against wind loads depends primarily on the adequacy of the provisions of codes of practice and wind load standards. During the past decades, much has been learned about along- and across-wind forces on buildings. However, studies on wind-induced torsional loads on buildings are very limited. The recent trends towards construction of more complex building shapes and structural systems can result in an increase of the unbalanced wind loads yielding an increase of torsional moments. Thus, re-visiting the wind load provisions is of an utmost concern to ensure their adequacy in evaluating torsion on low- and medium-rise buildings and to achieve safe, yet economic building design. It is noteworthy that most of the wind loading provisions on torsion have been developed from the research work largely directed towards very tall and flexible buildings for which resonant responses are significant. However, the dynamic response of most low- and medium-rise buildings is dominated by quasi-steady gust loading with little resonant effect. Moreover, the lack of knowledge regarding wind-induced torsion is reflected in having different approaches in evaluating torsion in the international wind loading codes and standards. udThe current research program undertakes the investigation of shear and torsional wind loads on low- and medium-rise buildings. The study demonstrates that North American and European Codes and Standards have quite different provisions for wind-induced torsion acting on low- and medium-rise buildings with typical geometries – namely, for horizontal aspect ratios (L/B) equal to 1, 2, and 3. In the experimental phase, several buildings with different configurations, i.e. different roof angles (0°, 18.4°, 45°) and heights (ranging from 6 m to 60 m) were tested in the boundary layer wind tunnel of Concordia University for different wind directions (every 15°). The measured shear and torsional loads were compared with the Canadian and American code provisions. The study found that NBCC 2010 underestimates torsion on low-rise buildings significantly, while discrepancies were found for medium-rise buildings. In addition, wind load combinations for low- and medium-rise buildings were studied. For flat-roofed buildings, it was found that maximum torsion for winds in transverse direction is associated with 80% of the overall shear force perpendicular to the longer horizontal building dimension; and 45% of the maximum shear occurs perpendicular to the smaller horizontal building dimension. Suggested approaches and load combination factors were introduced to enhance the current building codes and standards aiming at an adequate evaluation of wind load effects on low- and medium-rise buildings. ud
机译:正确的建筑设计抗风荷载主要取决于实践规范和风荷载标准的规定。在过去的几十年中,人们对建筑物上的顺风和逆风的了解很多。然而,关于建筑物上的风致扭转载荷的研究非常有限。建造更复杂的建筑形状和结构系统的最新趋势可能导致不平衡风荷载的增加,从而导致扭矩增加。因此,重新审查风荷载规定是确保其在评估中低层建筑物的扭转能力时是否合适以及实现安全而经济的建筑物设计的最重要的考虑。值得注意的是,大多数关于扭转的风荷载规定都是根据研究工作发展而来的,这些研究主要针对的是非常高且柔性的建筑物,对于这些建筑物而言,其共振响应非常重要。但是,大多数低层和中层建筑的动力响应主要是准稳态阵风载荷,几乎没有共振效应。此外,对风致扭转的认识不足反映在国际风荷载规范和标准中采用不同的方法来评估扭转。 ud目前的研究计划正在进行中低层建筑的剪力和扭转风荷载研究。研究表明,北美和欧洲规范和标准对作用在具有典型几何形状的低层和中层建筑上的风致扭转有不同的规定,即水平纵横比(L / B)等于1、2 3.在实验阶段,在康科迪亚大学边界层风洞中测试了几座具有不同配置的建筑物,即不同的屋顶角度(0°,18.4°,45°)和高度(范围从6 m到60 m)。适用于不同的风向(每15°)。将测得的剪切和扭转载荷与加拿大和美国规范的规定进行了比较。研究发现,NBCC 2010大大低估了低层建筑的扭转,而发现中层建筑的差异。此外,还研究了中低层建筑的风荷载组合。对于平屋顶建筑,发现横向风的最大扭转与垂直于较长水平建筑尺寸的总剪力的80%相关;最大剪切力的45%垂直于较小的水平建筑物尺寸而发生。引入了建议的方法和荷载组合因子,以增强当前的建筑规范和标准,旨在充分评估中低层建筑上的风荷载影响。 ud

著录项

  • 作者

    Elsharawy Mohamed Ragab;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号