Several decades of research into semantic memory have yielded two main perspectives as to how semantic memory may be organized. One hypothesis is that information is stored according to taxonomical categories (e.g., animals, objects); the other hypothesis suggests that information is stored according to featural attributes (e.g., functional and perceptual properties). Using a proactive interference (PI) paradigm, this study aimed to investigate these two hypotheses by contrasting the impact of categorical and featural cues on patterns of PI effects (i.e., buildup and release). Using the same stimuli and task, while examining recall performance and intrusion errors when featural and categorical information were opposed, allowed for a direct measure of the contribution of these two types of information for semantic organization. To explore semantic organization across the lifespan, 20 healthy younger and 20 healthy older participants were tested. Given that semantic memory deficits frequently occur in Alzheimer's disease (AD), the performance of the healthy older participants was also compared to 16 participants with AD to examine differences in semantic organization of featural and categorical information in individuals for whom there is a potential breakdown of semantic memory. All groups showed expected PI effects when stimuli were categorically cued. Participants also showed a release from PI when the featural cue changed (but the category remained the same). An unexpected release from PI effect was found in the featural PI continued condition in which the featural cue remained the same (e.g., USED FOR TRANSPORTATION) but there was an implicit switch in category (e.g., from OBJECTS to ANIMALS). The results are discussed in terms of the implications for the categorical and featural hypotheses of semantic memory organization.ud
展开▼
机译:几十年来对语义记忆的研究产生了关于语义记忆如何组织的两个主要观点。一种假设是信息是根据分类类别(例如动物,物体)存储的;另一个假设表明,信息是根据特征属性(例如,功能和感知属性)存储的。本研究使用主动干扰(PI)范式,旨在通过对比分类线索和特征线索对PI效应模式(即积累和释放)的影响来研究这两个假设。使用相同的刺激和任务,同时检查反对特征和类别信息时的召回性能和入侵错误,可以直接衡量这两种信息对语义组织的贡献。为了探索整个生命周期的语义组织,对20位健康的年轻参与者和20位健康的年龄较大的参与者进行了测试。鉴于在阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)中经常发生语义记忆缺陷,因此将健康的老年参与者的表现与16名患有AD的参与者的表现进行了比较,以检查存在潜在细分的个体的胎儿特征信息和类别信息的语义组织差异语义记忆。明确提示刺激后,所有组均显示出预期的PI效果。当胎儿提示改变时,参与者还显示出PI释放(但类别保持不变)。在胎儿PI持续状态中,尽管胎儿的提示保持不变(例如,用于运输),但是在类别上存在隐式转换(例如,从对象到动物),从PI效应中意外释放了PI效应。根据对语义记忆组织的分类和特征假设的含义来讨论结果。 ud
展开▼