首页> 外文OA文献 >Любовь в «Средние века»: sic et non
【2h】

Любовь в «Средние века»: sic et non

机译:中世纪之爱:原文如此

摘要

The given article presents a philosophical analysis of medieval love through the prism of Abelard’s antagonism, «sic et non». The medieval contradiction of the spheres of the ancestral and the individual in human life, love — eros and love — agape is considered. In the context of the question of love, the sources of cultural romanticism are examined, in particular, the cult of the eternal feminine and the cult of the Virgin Mary. The phenomena of courtly love, erotic love — passion, and marital infidelity are reviewed. The history of the Middle Ages shall long impress upon human consciousness the signposts of medieval thought, intruding into the dark corners of the subliminal present. In the Middle Ages, through the adoption of the famous «sic et non» of Abelard, this concept of love attains the status of a small yet pivotal representative part of the entire epoch. Another bright symbol of the Middle Ages is the very story of the love of Peter Abelard and Heloise. The love of Heloise and Abelard is first of all a story of an achieved choice. Let it sound paradoxical, but the choice is made by a sinful woman, Heloise. Peter Abelard is brought to the ascetic monastic life through an occurrence, a physical trauma after which he becomes unsuited to married life. Would Abelard have become a monk if he had not got that trauma? On the other hand, Heloise enters the monastery consciously choosing that way of life for her. Undoubtedly, it is worth noting, that she takes the nuns’ veil because of her love for Abelard, and not because of her love for God. Of the two thresholds of medieval love: the high and the low, only Peter Abelard stood upon the high threshold of love for God, while their passion-filled love, as Heloise herself, remained on the lower threshold of human love, and all such lower’s love is destined to a tragic end. The given article also examines the conflict between the personal and ancestral, which seemingly denies the existence of love as a phenomenon, while simultaneously affirming it. The traditional treatment of the religious Christian doctrine of sexual love is that it is something carnal and sinful. It can be made noble only through love of God, becoming love that is both spiritual and personal. Regarding Eros as exclusively sexual passion, connecting it to the carnal nature, therefore, does not accept any kind of expression of love between man and woman. This view regards marriage merely as a formal covenant for the proliferation of humankind. Sexual love, demeaned by religious doctrine and by the fear of sin in a God-fearing Christian, begins a human revolution, leading to the demise of morality on several rungs of the social ladder. Therefore, the appearance of love for sale and moral dissoluteness become endemic during the «dark ages». Sublimation of passion and sexual desire (which is often expressed through excessive piety), brought many to a rejection of self and built up projections of idealized images, which were merely illusion. Courtly love became an expression of such brightly colored illusions of the Middle Ages. Courtly love alongside the phenomenon of chivalry, occupies a vital place in the culture of the Middle Ages. The art of courtship, the winning of the lady’s heart, which becomes the meaning of life for the young knight, was so cunningly invented, that it not only brought pleasure, but also served as the unparalleled method of perfection of the knight himself. Nonetheless, courtly love as had been in the case with passionate love was doomed to unhappiness, insofar as its momentary pleasures clouded the vision of true love. The Christian flame of love — agape thus becomes true love. This love is merciful, directed to those who need it. It contains a deep religious and philosophical meaning; uncovering it a person may reach unity with God through a neighbour.This love is not an alternative, but rather a synthesis of Abelard’s «sic et non». It isa synthesis the key idea of which is a personal love that may be aimed at either ahuman or divine person.
机译:这篇给定的文章通过阿伯拉德(Abelard)的对立关系“ sic et non”对中世纪的爱情进行了哲学分析。在人类生活中祖先和个人领域的中世纪矛盾,爱(爱与爱情)被认为是爱。在爱情问题的背景下,文化浪漫主义的根源得到了检验,特别是对永恒女性的崇拜和圣母玛利亚的崇拜。回顾了宫廷爱情,色情爱情-激情和婚姻不忠现象。中世纪的历史将在人们的意识中长期铭刻中世纪思想的路标,闯入潜意识现在的黑暗角落。在中世纪,通过采用著名的《阿贝拉德小说》(sic et non),这种爱的概念获得了整个时代中一个很小但至关重要的代表部分的地位。中世纪的另一个鲜明标志是彼得·阿伯拉德(Peter Abelard)和赫洛伊斯(Heloise)的爱情故事。对海洛伊斯(Heloise)和亚伯拉德(Abelard)的热爱首先是一个成功选择的故事。听起来很矛盾,但选择是由一个有罪的女人Heloise做出的。彼得·阿伯拉德(Peter Abelard)因发生某种身体创伤而被带入苦行僧的生活,此后他变得不适合已婚生活。如果亚伯拉德没有受到创伤,他会成为一名和尚吗?另一方面,Heloise有意识地进入修道院,为她选择了这种生活方式。毫无疑问,值得注意的是,她之所以蒙着修女的面纱,是因为她对亚伯拉德的热爱,而不是因为她对上帝的热爱。在中世纪爱情的两个门槛中:高和低,只有彼得·亚伯拉德站在对上帝的爱的高门槛上,而他们充满激情的爱,如赫洛伊斯本人,仍然处于人类爱的较低门槛上,所有这些降低爱的命运注定是悲惨的结局。这篇给定的文章还考察了个人与祖先之间的冲突,这些冲突似乎在否认爱情的现象,同时又肯定了爱情的存在。基督教对性爱的信奉教义的传统方法是,这是肉体和犯罪的。只有通过对上帝的爱,它才能成为高尚的东西,成为既属灵又属个人的爱。因此,将爱神视为纯粹的性激情,将其与肉体联系起来,就不接受男女之间的任何形式的爱表达。这种观点仅将婚姻视为人类扩散的正式盟约。性爱被宗教教义和敬畏上帝的基督徒对罪的恐惧所贬低,开始了一场人类革命,导致社会阶梯上的道德沦丧。因此,在“黑暗时代”,对买卖的热爱和道德上的放荡变得普遍。激情和性欲的升华(通常通过过度的虔诚来表达)使许多人拒绝了自我,并建立了理想化图像的投射,这仅仅是幻觉。礼貌的爱情成为了这种鲜艳幻彩的中世纪幻想的表达。有礼貌的爱情和骑士精神在中世纪的文化中占有举足轻重的地位。求爱的艺术,赢得女士的心,这成为年轻骑士的生命的意义,是如此巧妙地发明,不仅带来了快乐,而且还成为了骑士本人无与伦比的完美方法。然而,就如充满激情的爱那样,有礼貌的爱注定要不幸,因为它的短暂的欢乐笼罩了真爱的视线。基督教的爱之火焰-agape因此成为真正的爱。这种爱是仁慈的,针对需要它的人。它包含着深刻的宗教和哲学含义;揭露一个人可能会通过邻居与上帝达成统一。这种爱不是替代选择,而是阿贝拉德的《不可思议》的综合。它是一种综合,其主要思想是针对人或神的人的个人爱。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号